Insurance sending request after crash?
-
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:20 am
Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby rabobank89 » Sat Feb 09, 2013 9:55 am
Strangely the other day I received a letter from an insurance company (no doubt from the drivers insurance) requesting information from the incident to proceed with a claim?
I would assume the insurance company would be able to get the police report, so a little confused why I'm getting a letter.. Is the insurance company trying to get me to pay the ladies car damage? A little frustrating because at the time of the scene all I saw was a small scratch on her Getz whilst my $10k bike was totalled...
Seems dodgy... Any advice would be appreciated... Is it necessary to visit a lawyer or simply provide the insurance company with a new description of the incident?
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby RonK » Sat Feb 09, 2013 10:00 am
-
- Posts: 351
- Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 9:44 am
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby lump_a_charcoal » Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:56 pm
RonK wrote:Yes, they are going to make a claim against you. Tell them nothing until advised by your insurance company or legal advisor.
This.
Do not even respond to them, except to point them to your lawyer.
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21352
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby g-boaf » Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:16 pm
-
- Posts: 2613
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 8:06 pm
- Location: Rivervale WA
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby moosterbounce » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:09 pm
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21352
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby g-boaf » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:29 pm
FOI is usually pretty cheap - but even if they did make a request, which I'm not sure they could, the OP would be a 3rd party and would therefore likely need to be notified of the application and given time to lodge an objection. And then it all becomes very interesting.moosterbounce wrote:Insurance companies need to submit an foi request to police to get crash details I think. There's a cost plus time issue there. They may be trying to shortcut it, but I doubt it. Be cautious.
There should normally be an FOI manual you can consult for the processes surrounding this. In NSW - there was one.
-
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 11:20 am
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby rabobank89 » Sat Feb 09, 2013 10:23 pm
Such a headache this ordeal has become..
-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 1:52 am
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby ftssjk » Sat Feb 09, 2013 10:57 pm
basically what happens is in the event of a hit and run or similar is that the motor accidents authority (i think thats what it was), allocates an insurance company,
and they put that as the nominated defendant.
then the solicitor will then put a claim out in the newspaper 'seeking witnesses' etc, then after the submission of evidence or what have you the insurance company will then make a verdit as to pay out or not.
its been a while and i've forgotten most of the details (i was a temporary PA to one of the solicitors there)
but yes, get a solicitor.
Could be something good. (like a nominated defendant), but could be bad as well.
- jules21
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: deep in the pain cave
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby jules21 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 12:03 pm
i don't believe you necessarily need to go to the expense of hiring a lawyer for traffic incidents. they're pretty black-and-white, including when there are conflicting stories.rabobank89 wrote:Seems dodgy... Any advice would be appreciated... Is it necessary to visit a lawyer or simply provide the insurance company with a new description of the incident?
if i were you, i'd start by writing back to the insurance company seeking advice on the nature of the claim they quoted - who they are representing, what the claim is - before agreeing to divulge information.
have you made a claim against the driver? if you believe the driver was in the wrong and you suffered material damages (your bike), you should have done that. it's not too late. it's not a good look for them to be pursuing you, while you haven't made a claim against the driver - that can make you look guilty.
if the insurance company are reprsenting the driver (which seems most likely), you should put in a claim against them. a friend of mine did this recently (against the driver directly, who didn't claim against his insurance) and took him to magistrate's court, represented himself, and won 80% of his claim (they never give you 100%). doesn't have to cost you a cent (well, there are nominal court fees). where the road rules are clear and you can demonstrate how the driver breached them (location of damage on the vehicle is often good evidence - if you had pics from the incident that would help) then you don't need a QC, just represent yourself.
people often lack the confidence to take on "big insurance companies and their lawyers", but the truth is, your case is just another in a long line they are dealing with and they will often be ill-prepared to prosecute it. on the other hand, if you do your homework - establish all the facts of the case that you can, with photos etc. - you are more likely to impress a magistrate.
- birdbrain
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: tulla melb
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby birdbrain » Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:02 pm
rabobank89 wrote:
Hey guys... As some of you know I was hit by a car a few months ago.. Police report was done and police found the result inconclusive due to no witnesses and conflicting stories..
Strangely the other day I received a letter from an insurance company (no doubt from the drivers insurance) requesting information from the incident to proceed with a claim?
I would assume the insurance company would be able to get the police report, so a little confused why I'm getting a letter.. Is the insurance company trying to get me to pay the ladies car damage? A little frustrating because at the time of the scene all I saw was a small scratch on her Getz whilst my $10k bike was totalled...
Seems dodgy... Any advice would be appreciated... Is it necessary to visit a lawyer or simply provide the insurance company with a new description of the incident?
The driver who ran into the back of me insurance co got the incident report and witness statements by going through the same process that I went through to get them. The critea is:
that I am an authorised person under Section 118N of the Police Regulation Act 1958 ie. a person:
(a) who is injured as a result of a vehicle accident or,
(b) whose property is damaged or destroyed as a result of a vehicle accident or,
(c) who is a personal representative of a person who diesor is injured, or whose property is damaged or destroyed, as a result of a vehicle accident or,
(d) who is an authorised representative of a person referred to in paragraph (a) or (b) or a personal representative referred to in paragraph (c)
then it basically goes on to say:
that I am requesting vehicle accident information for one or more of the following authorised purposes......
(a) to obtain legal advice in relation to the vehicle accident....
(b) to recover any loss or damage incurred or suffered, or costs incurred, as a result of the vehicle accident......
I would say that the drivers insurance company intend taking legal action against you but it may depend on what the incident report says. Knowing what I know now would I hire a lawyer! Well if the incident report and any witness statements were inconclusive then I would'nt bother. I would only hire a lawyer if I felt I had a good chance of getting a settlement from the drivers insurance company.
What would I have done in the first instance?
Immediately after the accident I would have sent a letter of demand and 2 quotes to the driver and given them 30 days to settle the claim or legal action would be taken to recover my losses.
At this point I would be on the front foot and sending them a claim for the damage to your bike. What they will probably try to do is bully you into paying for the damage to the drivers car. Bullying and thugery is what they are specialists at.
- Summernight
- Posts: 2073
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby Summernight » Sun Feb 10, 2013 8:21 pm
Also remember insurers do risk assessments and litigation is expensive (they employ the BIG law firms who can charge through the nose) so they will sometimes settle before court ( although some only start negotiations the day before court )birdbrain wrote: At this point I would be on the front foot and sending them a claim for the damage to your bike. What they will probably try to do is bully you into paying for the damage to the drivers car. Bullying and thugery is what they are specialists at.
If they do sue and you haven't already made a claim for your bike etc. that is when you should be making a counterclaim.
Some insurers only understand aggression. Hope that's not the case in your situation.
P.S. If you haven't sent a demand you still have time. You have 6 years from the date of the accident to sue.
- London Boy
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:43 pm
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby London Boy » Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:08 pm
I don't know what state we are talking about, but in Qld the limitation period for personal injury is 3 years. I've not looked at the limitations acts in the other states to check, not that it should be an issue given the timeframes we are talking about.Summernight wrote:Also remember insurers do risk assessments and litigation is expensive (they employ the BIG law firms who can charge through the nose) so they will sometimes settle before court ( although some only start negotiations the day before court )
If they do sue and you haven't already made a claim for your bike etc. that is when you should be making a counterclaim.
Some insurers only understand aggression. Hope that's not the case in your situation.
P.S. If you haven't sent a demand you still have time. You have 6 years from the date of the accident to sue.
- jules21
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: deep in the pain cave
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby jules21 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:53 pm
although i think this is a property claim anywayLondon Boy wrote:I don't know what state we are talking about, but in Qld the limitation period for personal injury is 3 years. I've not looked at the limitations acts in the other states to check, not that it should be an issue given the timeframes we are talking about.
- Summernight
- Posts: 2073
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby Summernight » Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:28 pm
Hence why speaking to a lawyer would be good - to get the right time limits for the particular State in question.jules21 wrote:although i think this is a property claim anywayLondon Boy wrote:I don't know what state we are talking about, but in Qld the limitation period for personal injury is 3 years. I've not looked at the limitations acts in the other states to check, not that it should be an issue given the timeframes we are talking about.
- jules21
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: deep in the pain cave
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby jules21 » Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:40 pm
you may have noticed in my comments i'm a bit reticent to hire lawyers. as someone who has done that and poured a small fortune into their coffers, for reasons other than traffic incidents, you learn to be judicious about when to engage them. traffic incidents are relatively straightforward and while it's certainly useful to have a lawyer advising and acting for you, they're amongst the most straightforward of legal issues and you can do most of it yourself for "free".Summernight wrote:Hence why speaking to a lawyer would be good - to get the right time limits for the particular State in question.
- birdbrain
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: tulla melb
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby birdbrain » Mon Feb 11, 2013 2:06 pm
Having a lawyer might add a little weight to your claim for damages but I agree it's a straightforward process in the Magistrates Court here in Melbourne as I discovered. They even give you a free booklet on representing yourself in civil claims and it's really quite easy.Jules21 wrote:
traffic incidents are relatively straightforward and while it's certainly useful to have a lawyer advising and acting for you, they're amongst the most straightforward of legal issues and you can do most of it yourself for "free".
Again, the only information I would give them is a claim for your damages.rabobank89 wrote:
Strangely the other day I received a letter from an insurance company (no doubt from the drivers insurance) requesting information from the incident to proceed with a claim?
- Summernight
- Posts: 2073
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Insurance sending request after crash?
Postby Summernight » Mon Feb 11, 2013 4:34 pm
Agreed about the Magistrates' Court in Victoria (Birdbrain's post) and about the possibility of representing yourself there (the judges will also try and help you along to some extent).jules21 wrote:you may have noticed in my comments i'm a bit reticent to hire lawyers. as someone who has done that and poured a small fortune into their coffers, for reasons other than traffic incidents, you learn to be judicious about when to engage them. traffic incidents are relatively straightforward and while it's certainly useful to have a lawyer advising and acting for you, they're amongst the most straightforward of legal issues and you can do most of it yourself for "free".Summernight wrote:Hence why speaking to a lawyer would be good - to get the right time limits for the particular State in question.
My lawyer reference was referring to the fact that my 6 year time limit statement was possibly referring to the wrong time limit in the wrong State - not helpful for the OP if he is in another State that has different time limits. But no-one is going to listen to advice on internet forums anyway.
The Courts can be quite helpful sometimes if you want to know procedures (not providing legal advice, but the procedures of the courts and what happens or needs to be done next). I do like those brochures.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.