human909 wrote:Given them a full width DEDICATED lane during peak hour would half the number of lanes available to general traffic.
Get rid of half the cars, put them all in buses and on bikes, treble the road capacity. What a great idea!!

Moron Motorists #3Re: Moron Motorists #3
Get rid of half the cars, put them all in buses and on bikes, treble the road capacity. What a great idea!! ![]() Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Moron Motorists #3
I always get asked why I ride right on the line. I explain it. Doesn't help
Re: Moron Motorists #3
<snip 8< > So I'll admit it, I had to google this Sharrow thing, and turns out one has just showed up in Cairns - I think. What happened was that our new 'progressive' council decided that a section of a dedicated cycleway was going to be ripped up and converted into on street car parking. After much protesting by local cycling advocates, a compromised was reached, where the two lane cycleway was narrowed to single lane, for city bound bikes, while outbound cycle traffic joins the one way general traffic what I assume to be a sharrow (please confirm - have posted a vid) With the Sharrow came a reduced 30 kph speed limit, which is pretty much the speed of most of us that used the old cycleway. The design flaw is that a cyclist must turn across the flow of traffic to regain the dedicated cycleway at the end of the straight that's in the video, so the safest thing to do is ride wide and occupy the lane - at the posted speed limit. Where this falls down is the new speed limit is ignored and not enforced, so I have had idiots overtake me in the vacant car parking spots to the right (phew... back OT!)
Re: Moron Motorists #3
Thank Howzat for this pic... ![]() I've put it on me phone for easy access and have already asked two loud people what they would do in my shoes, they went quiet... ...whatever the road rules, self-preservation is the absolute priority for a cyclist when mixing it with motorised traffic.
London Boy 29/12/2011
Re: Moron Motorists #3Those sharrow things are old hat in Sydney. My take on them is they are intended to convery the impression that bikes should not occupy the lane, they should stay left in the gutter where they belong. Certainly that's how drivers here interpret them.
"People have a right to their own opinions, but not their own facts. Evidence must be located, not created, and opinions not backed by evidence cannot be given much weight." -- James W Loewen
http://www.facebook.com/Drive2WorkDay
Re: Moron Motorists #3
I can't fault your logic! However I guess I'm just a little more pessimistic/realistic about what changes are possible in Melbourne. (at least in the next decade or so)
Re: Moron Motorists #3
Always going to depend on their appropriate placement, together with public statements about them. ![]() ![]() Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Moron Motorists #3yeah, Ryde Council has them painted plentifully in the middle of many of their rat runs - relatively enlightened Council, methinks.
Most of the "sharrow" symbols are relatively old. "People have a right to their own opinions, but not their own facts. Evidence must be located, not created, and opinions not backed by evidence cannot be given much weight." -- James W Loewen
http://www.facebook.com/Drive2WorkDay
Re: Moron Motorists #3
What Clarendon St is that, doesn't look like the one in South Melbourne. DS Riding: Cannondale Quick Speed 2
Re: Moron Motorists #3Clarendon St, East Melbourne.
The one in South Melbourne apparently has had a rather contentious proposal some years back for kerb-access tram platforms, later dropped. Not sure what has happened, I rarely go down that way. Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Moron Motorists #3
In Summer hill, they actually had to put out witches hats the day before, so they'd have clear space to paint the bicycle symbols under the parked cars. It is possibly the dumbest thing I've seen.
Re: Moron Motorists #3I won't call her a moron motorist, maybe a senile old motorist. Anyway granny, she must have been around 90 does a right hand turn as I'm approaching in the opposite direction. Head down, crouched over the streering wheel fixated on making the turn and she had no idea that I was even there. Fortunately she was moving so slowly that I had time to manouve around the back of her old gallopy. I'm thinking surely there comes a time when motorists reach a certain age and they need to be retested.
Re: Moron Motorists #3
I've downloaded that picture and I will do the same at every opportunity I get. Thanks 2012 Oppy A4 | 200x Hard tail Kona Blast Deluxe
Re: Moron Motorists #3
In NSW, they are. My Father in Law was just retested recently. Unfortunately, dementia can push through a critical threshhold and rather suddenly they can go from mildly impaired but coping to being dangerous and no longer fit to drive. On the other side is the fact that losing access to driving leaves elderly people isolated and unable to cope with everyday tasks like shopping and visiting friends. Not everyone has family around them to manage the transition into assisted living. Most resist it fiercely - retirement homes aren't the nicest places to live: the company is dreadful. Almost your new housemates are more advanced in their dementia than you. Imagine going from being comfortable in your own home to being unable to leave an asylum. Overnight. Not saying that they should be allowed to continue driving and put themselves and others at risk, just that I have some sympathy for them. Had to put my parents into a home 5 years ago. It was ugly. Mum "checked out" within two months. Dad is still there, and sometiems asks after mum, doesn't remember that she's passed. At least he still remembers who I am. Last edited by trailgumby on Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"People have a right to their own opinions, but not their own facts. Evidence must be located, not created, and opinions not backed by evidence cannot be given much weight." -- James W Loewen
http://www.facebook.com/Drive2WorkDay
Re: Moron Motorists #3
I believe Bike North was instrumental in getting Ryde Council to correctly ace the bicycle logos. North Sydney council could learn a few things from them! '11 Lynskey Cooper CX, '00 Hillbrick Steel Racing (Total Rebuild '10), '09 Electra Townie Original 21D
Re: Moron Motorists #3[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDJr51GukT8&hd=1[/youtube]
This incident occurred on the Esplanade, Scarborugh. First time in a number of years riding along here have I came across a Mr MGIF at all costs. There is some choice language hence the sound is turned off. When he failed to respond to my yell, you can see me getting closer to the kerb I hit the side of his car with my hand. That didn't go down to well. At that point he wound down his left window and had his hand waving for me to come alongside for chat. Right, I am really going to put myself in a position where he can have a second go at me, not. After calling out a couple of times he was being videoed and that a Police report would be made (pointless exercise mind you) he moved on. There ends another day on Perth roads. Oh the front handlebar movement is because my little Jumbo HD808 #11 is back on the bars and any movement whilst riding is seriously exaggerated. Hopefully the GoPro Hero3 will not be as bad or I need to smooth our my riding style and the long lead in is for Police reporting purposes not that I am sure there is any point in that now. Andrew Andrew
Re: Moron Motorists #3
I showed this pic to a coworker who complains that cyclists don't ride in the bike lane and was told that it was just the angle, there was probably not even a cyclist coming and we should be able to just avoid the doors if they open. Poe's Law in full effect. . Andrew: Have you considered a different mount location? My initial reaction to both of your incidents at that roundabout was that it didn't seem to be very close. There have been some unusual mount locations (chest mount, rear-facing handlebar mount) in the videos posted to this thread which give a much better feel for the closeness of the incident.
Re: Moron Motorists #3
I have used helmet mounts before but not keen on the GoPro on the helmet. The key with the likes of the roundabout (and this is harder in YouTube) is to actually check the timing, look at indicators on the road etc. Easier when you can step through the video which you can do in iMovie/QUicktime etc. Andrew
Re: Moron Motorists #3
The perversenous of this comment is that of course we will avoid the car doors that we can. Its the ones you can't avoid that get you.
Re: Moron Motorists #3
Tried chest mount? An upside of having on the helmet is that it is much more conspicuous to other road users, especially from behind. Provides a greater disincentive to act like an idiot, it seems. Downside is the weight on my helmet in addition to the lights, the helmet seems to get rocked around a lot more. Last edited by trailgumby on Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"People have a right to their own opinions, but not their own facts. Evidence must be located, not created, and opinions not backed by evidence cannot be given much weight." -- James W Loewen
http://www.facebook.com/Drive2WorkDay
Re: Moron Motorists #3
Not to mention that avoiding the suddenly opened car door was what killed James Cross..... and that lady cycling along the waterfront in Aukland Last edited by il padrone on Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Re: Moron Motorists #3
I'm not 100% happy with helmet mount. Good footage but extra weight and the helmet needs to be tight to not move around. Too tight. How do you find the chest mount for capturing close shaves and other "need to see extreme left or right" type incidents TG? Avanti Quantum, Salsa Casseroll, Specialized Tricross
Re: Moron Motorists #3I think the chest mount shows the proximity far better than the helmet mount, as the bars being in frame gives an item of known width to compare against. It also provides a view of what's going on with your controls (eg, brakes) that you don't get from the helmet or bars.
The helmet mount shows where I'm looking much better, and is more visible to motorists - better for keeping the idiots at bay. However, I agree with your list of issues - see above. On the downside, chest mount is noticeably hotter to ride with, especially in the bush where your bike speeds are lower, and it is more prone to catching spray off the front tyre in damp conditions. Oh, and don't fall off the front of your bike. Overall, I think I prefer the chest mount, especially off-road. But not by much. "People have a right to their own opinions, but not their own facts. Evidence must be located, not created, and opinions not backed by evidence cannot be given much weight." -- James W Loewen
http://www.facebook.com/Drive2WorkDay
Re: Moron Motorists #3
Would it work on a drop bar? Andrew
Re: Moron Motorists #3Here's a comparison video for you Andrew.
Riding bikes in traffic - what seems dangerous is usually safe; what seems safe is often more dangerous.
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: cireham, dale79, KonaCommuter, ldrcycles, mikgit, Timbo1 |
Top Bikes & Gear
Exclusive: BNA 10% discount for ProBikeKit |