Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
-
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:33 pm
Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby ausrandoman » Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:05 pm
What's it got to with cycling? What if some bright spark decided the law should also apply to one cyclist riding behind another?
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby il padrone » Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:24 pm
A government desperate to get some media image and bonus points with flagging polls, methinks.
This being the key to the story:
However, Mr Mulder had no word on when the tougher laws would be introduced or how they would be policed. Nor was there any funding for the new legislation or technology, he said.
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/laser ... z2Lyou82BE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Anyway, this has little relevance to cycling:
1. Cyclists tailgating one another, while commonplace, is not renowned for severe injuries or frequent deaths on the roads.
2. There is no specific law outlawing a cyclist tailgating another cyclist. Only to prevent tailgating a car.
I don't foresee any major police actions on Beach Road peletons to break them up into individuals with > 2m clearance.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:33 pm
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby ausrandoman » Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:47 pm
il padrone wrote:
(snip)
1. Cyclists tailgating one another, while commonplace, is not renowned for severe injuries or frequent deaths on the roads.
(snip)
Last year, a commenter on this forum threatened to physically assault me for making this assertion. He might be in favour of anti-tailgating laws for cyclists.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby il padrone » Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:59 pm
So he knows of some rash of bicycle tailgating injuries that are clogging up our hospital resources? Or have there been a lot of cyclist tailgating deaths that the media has hidden from us (damned media - always has a conspiracy running )?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Marto
- Posts: 1343
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:08 am
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby Marto » Tue Feb 26, 2013 6:24 pm
How can they be allowed to do that trick without wearing a helmet? Sure it's a bit of fun but it sets a bad example, is inconsiderate, and is dangerous to others in the vicinity. Sorry, but they should be made an example of before others emulate this behaviour in a copycat fashion.il padrone wrote:Two major pronouncements on road safety by the Victorian Government in two days. ..
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby Mulger bill » Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:50 pm
Call me cynical, but...
London Boy 29/12/2011
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby il padrone » Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:11 am
A quick Google search drew a blank, except for devices to prevent entry into secure areas by tailgating ie. to get through a secure entry; and other more speculative efforts to monitor and divert traffic flows and speeds. Nothing that looks anything like monitoring, identifying and enforcing.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby Mulger bill » Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:37 am
il padrone wrote:Don't jump the gun Mulger. I'll believe this "new technology" when I see it
A quick Google search drew a blank, except for devices to prevent entry into secure areas by tailgating ie. to get through a secure entry; and other more speculative efforts to monitor and divert traffic flows and speeds. Nothing that looks anything like monitoring, identifying and enforcing.
HERE you go... I vaguely recall reading about a fixed freeway version based on overhead cameras and spaced cateye reflectors mid lane.The linked article wrote:Number two; we're going to bring in legislation to support it; number three, we're going to be looking at the technology that's currently being used overseas for successful prosecutions to bring that technology to Victoria.
London Boy 29/12/2011
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 11:22 pm
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby knightsy » Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:43 am
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby il padrone » Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:56 am
Today it's P-platers banned from using hands-free mobile phones.
Yesterday the "crack-down" on tailgating drivers
Monday was the alcohol interlock devices for anyone over 0.05
Do I smell an election in the wings, a government trying desperately to hide other bad news, or just trying to build some cred for actually doing something??? Hmm....
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Howzat
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:08 pm
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby Howzat » Wed Feb 27, 2013 10:24 am
Look, the minister announced a definitive three point action plan.il padrone wrote:Another day - another Victorian Government road safety "initiative"
1. He's going to do something.
2. He's going to legislate something.
3. He's going to look at something.
... and all the undeserving public can do is scoff and hoot.
- biker jk
- Posts: 7012
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:18 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby biker jk » Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:15 pm
The interesting statistic was that 55,000 Victorians were issued with fines last year for illegal use of a mobile phone while driving. Perhaps confiscating the phone may be a more effective deterrent?il padrone wrote:Another day - another Victorian Government road safety "initiative"
Today it's P-platers banned from using hands-free mobile phones.
Yesterday the "crack-down" on tailgating drivers
Monday was the alcohol interlock devices for anyone over 0.05
Do I smell an election in the wings, a government trying desperately to hide other bad news, or just trying to build some cred for actually doing something??? Hmm....
- blkmcs
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:44 pm
- Location: Bayswater, WA
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby blkmcs » Wed Feb 27, 2013 5:49 pm
In WA the Traffic Code is quite clear; there are no exemptions for cyclists following other cyclists.il padrone wrote:...
Anyway, this has little relevance to cycling:
1. Cyclists tailgating one another, while commonplace, is not renowned for severe injuries or frequent deaths on the roads.
2. There is no specific law outlawing a cyclist tailgating another cyclist. Only to prevent tailgating a car....
109. Keeping a safe distance behind vehicles
Except when overtaking and passing, the driver of any vehicle
shall, when following another vehicle, keep such distance
behind it as will enable the driver to stop the vehicle in an
emergency with safety, and without running into the vehicle in
front of him or her.
Points: 1 Modified penalty: 2 PU
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby il padrone » Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:03 pm
Yes, that is the safe distance rule applies for all. But not what the alleged rule change was all about.blkmcs wrote:In WA the Traffic Code is quite clear; there are no exemptions for cyclists following other cyclists.il padrone wrote:...
Anyway, this has little relevance to cycling:
1. Cyclists tailgating one another, while commonplace, is not renowned for severe injuries or frequent deaths on the roads.
2. There is no specific law outlawing a cyclist tailgating another cyclist. Only to prevent tailgating a car....
109. Keeping a safe distance behind vehicles
Except when overtaking and passing, the driver of any vehicle
shall, when following another vehicle, keep such distance
behind it as will enable the driver to stop the vehicle in an
emergency with safety, and without running into the vehicle in
front of him or her.
Points: 1 Modified penalty: 2 PU
Incidentally any riders in a peleton would be able to argue that they were riding in a co-operative style where they did not brake suddenly or unnecessarily, and any braking actions were signalled and warned verbally through the group. Hence all group-members should be able to stop safely (as all peletons do). Ring-ins of course are another thing.
There is a tailgating rule that specifically outlaws a cyclist from riding closer than 2m from the rear of a motor vehicle for more than 200m (Rule 255). This provides a much clearer requirement for a set distance. No such rule applies for motor vehicles driving very close (as there is also no such requirement for cyclists following another cyclist), and it is this type of rule that I believe the state government is talking about trying to introduce. The mechanics of spelling it out in legislation will prove too complex however as a say, 10m space will be fine at 40kmh, but dangerously close at 100kmh. And less than 5m would be quite safe for most cyclists at almost any speed, so they would have to exempt cyclists
Just my uneducated non-lawyer's view of the rules.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:33 pm
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby ausrandoman » Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:36 pm
Semi-trailer drivers sometimes drive in tandem with very little clearance so the rear truck saves fuel. It's illegal but it sometimes happens. I don't like their chances if they tried to argueil padrone wrote:
Incidentally any riders in a peleton would be able to argue that they were riding in a co-operative style where they did not brake suddenly or unnecessarily, and any braking actions were signalled and warned verbally through the group. Hence all group-members should be able to stop safely (as all peletons do). Ring-ins of course are another thing.
Just my uneducated non-lawyer's view of the rules.
I then read on and found il padrone's signature lineil padrone wrote: that they were [driving] in a co-operative style where they did not brake suddenly or unnecessarily, and any braking actions were signalled and warned verbally [by radio or hands-free phone] through the group. Hence all group-members should be able to stop safely (as all [bicycle] peletons do)
il padrone wrote: "Remember, cyclists fare best when they act and are treated like drivers of vehicles"
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby il padrone » Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:53 pm
Yep, certainly agree with that. There are a limited number of specific rules for cyclists that are somewhat different - does not change the basic principle however.ausrandoman wrote:I then read on and found il padrone's signature line
il padrone wrote: "Remember, cyclists fare best when they act and are treated like drivers of vehicles"
The rule on safe distance is not one of these however. The key thing about it is:
keep such distance behind it as will enable the driver to stop the vehicle in an emergency with safety, and without running into the vehicle in front of him or her.
Cyclists riding in a peleton should certainly always do this. If you are not confident that you cannot stop safely (with your cycling mates) then you should not be there. Equally lead riders in a peleton should always indicate hazards and call when stopping or slowing. Pretty basic really.
Semi-trailers driving in a close convoy should also be doing the same. I kinda doubt a 'blind' truckie (close behind another) carrying 30 tonnes at 110kmh would go anywhere near being able to stop in time when the brakelights go red in front. But I'm no truckie.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:39 pm
- Location: Perth CBD
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby MrDerrickC » Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:17 pm
- trailgumby
- Posts: 15469
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby trailgumby » Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:30 pm
Sounds like another recent Labor state ex-government I seem to recall. They must have all gone to the same School of Politics when they did their degrees.il padrone wrote:Another day - another Victorian Government road safety "initiative"
Today it's P-platers banned from using hands-free mobile phones.
Yesterday the "crack-down" on tailgating drivers
Monday was the alcohol interlock devices for anyone over 0.05
Do I smell an election in the wings, a government trying desperately to hide other bad news, or just trying to build some cred for actually doing something??? Hmm....
Eventually the population will start laughing at the joke, and they'll be annihilated at the polls. Which will be a setback for our democracy - we need a reasonably strong opposition to avoid the excesses of excessive power.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby il padrone » Thu Feb 28, 2013 9:06 am
Very puzzling, whatever is going on?? All what would be classed as 'motherhood' actions though.
Now I am left wondering what it will be tomorrow to make it the full quinella......... Ah! I know - registration for those dangerous damned cyclists Watch the votes roll in boys!
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby Mulger bill » Thu Feb 28, 2013 10:42 am
Indeed, I smell deflection in the air...il padrone wrote:Fourth day..... fourth public road law pronouncement !!
Very puzzling, whatever is going on??
London Boy 29/12/2011
- Summernight
- Posts: 2073
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby Summernight » Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:30 pm
Whatever are they trying to cover up?
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby il padrone » Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:54 pm
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/billi ... 2fabt.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- Summernight
- Posts: 2073
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby Summernight » Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:08 pm
Although taking the money from TAC is a REALLY bad idea. Isn't that money used to compensate accident VICTIMS? From what I've heard the TAC is already stingy enough with handing out to legitimate road accident victims when these people should be fully compensated for their medical expenses etc. Especially if it wasn't their fault they were injured.
And a $1 billion loss last year? Probably caused by the government ripping out funds through their government 'dividends' fraud like they did with Melbourne Water Corp and the Victorian WorkSafe Authority etc.
But what else do we get from this government?
- rifraf
- Posts: 3851
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:55 pm
- Location: Two Rocks, WA
Re: Tailgating and opening cans of worms.
Postby rifraf » Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:50 pm
Your cynical Mulger billMulger bill wrote:Hmmm, all of a sudden new technology exists to cheaply and easily detect, record and invoice vehicle spacing and all of a sudden, tailgating becomes a new No1 road menace requiring "Tough New Laws"TM.
Call me cynical, but...
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.