Hardly relevant if cost isn't a reason why somebody isn't wearing a helmet.outnabike wrote: I know what you are saying , but one ticket will cost more than the helmet and then you still have to get a helmet.
Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (MHL discussion)
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby human909 » Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:24 pm
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby il padrone » Sat Mar 23, 2013 7:16 pm
Yeah, but QV is throwing the baby out with the bath-water - right-side riding, maybe footpaths too...... wonder how many red lights he runs? Maybe fear and insecurity, inexperience or just blatant rule disobedience. Doesn't matter that much if the Police ping him and multiple offenses are going to hurt the hip pocket nerve.human909 wrote:Hardly relevant if cost isn't a reason why somebody isn't wearing a helmet.outnabike wrote: I know what you are saying , but one ticket will cost more than the helmet and then you still have to get a helmet.
Just as long as he's aware of the repercussions.
- QuangVuong
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:04 pm
- Location: Villawood, Sydney
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby QuangVuong » Sat Mar 23, 2013 8:27 pm
I do have a helmet, but don't like wearing it. Maybe it's a cheapo helmet and that's the reason why.
If I ever do cop a fine, then that will prob be the time when I wear the helmet 100% of the time on a bike. Hope they don't catch all the safety requirements on the bike that aren't there. No reflectors other than on the pedals, no lights(but I rarely ride at night), and no bell. Otherwise it's a 100% safe bike.
- wurtulla wabbit
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:08 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby wurtulla wabbit » Sat Mar 23, 2013 8:41 pm
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby il padrone » Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:03 pm
- QuangVuong
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:04 pm
- Location: Villawood, Sydney
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby QuangVuong » Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:30 pm
Any roads that I don't know, then I'd be on the left shoulder and riding much slower than normal.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby il padrone » Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:35 pm
- damhooligan
- Posts: 3409
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:16 pm
- Location: melbourne
- Contact:
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby damhooligan » Sat Mar 23, 2013 9:46 pm
you may know the area, but you can't predict the future.....QuangVuong wrote:What other cyclists? Where I ride, there are no other cyclists. Plus this is around my local area, so I know the roads and how empty they are.
Any roads that I don't know, then I'd be on the left shoulder and riding much slower than normal.
knowing the roads means nothing...
I agree with il padrone on this one.
- DavidS
- Posts: 3632
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:24 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby DavidS » Sun Mar 24, 2013 1:07 am
Which is why discouraging cycling by mandating the wearing of helmets is so so stupid.human909 wrote: The public and private saving of more cycling are massive.
It's not just the inconvenience of wearing the helmet. I just have to live with that since I don't want to pay a fine. It is the impression that cycling is very dangerous, so dangerous that we have to wear helmets for our own good, that is really discouraging. I had an argument a few months ago with someone who was shocked I thought riding without a helmet was fine (me and my 18yo daughter had just gone for a ride on the Bellarine Peninsula sans helmets). She said it was far too dangerous and she certainly wouldn't let her, admittedly younger, children ride without a helmet (I rode at their age without a helmet, no-one had them then). I had another comment recently that cycling was far too dangerous to cycle without a helmet. These arguments and this perception of the relative safety/dangerousness of cycling just did not exist before the stupid MHLs. The harm done by promoting the perceived danger of riding a bike will take decades to repair.
DS
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby il padrone » Sun Mar 24, 2013 7:28 am
I have had frequent comments along the lines of "Gosh you're so brave! I could never do that. There's just too much traffic to ride a bike". Even wearing helmets it is regarded as just too dangerous. This attitude was not such a common statement in the 70s & 80s.DavidS wrote: I had another comment recently that cycling was far too dangerous to cycle without a helmet. These arguments and this perception of the relative safety/dangerousness of cycling just did not exist before the stupid MHLs. The harm done by promoting the perceived danger of riding a bike will take decades to repair.
- QuangVuong
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:04 pm
- Location: Villawood, Sydney
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby QuangVuong » Sun Mar 24, 2013 7:46 am
Wearing a helmet doesn't make cycling any more safe. Sure it'll protect your head a little if you fall or something, but it doesn't reduce the chances of you falling. Maybe some people reckon that they be perfectly fine as long as they wear a helmet.DavidS wrote:Which is why discouraging cycling by mandating the wearing of helmets is so so stupid.human909 wrote: The public and private saving of more cycling are massive.
It's not just the inconvenience of wearing the helmet. I just have to live with that since I don't want to pay a fine. It is the impression that cycling is very dangerous, so dangerous that we have to wear helmets for our own good, that is really discouraging. I had an argument a few months ago with someone who was shocked I thought riding without a helmet was fine (me and my 18yo daughter had just gone for a ride on the Bellarine Peninsula sans helmets). She said it was far too dangerous and she certainly wouldn't let her, admittedly younger, children ride without a helmet (I rode at their age without a helmet, no-one had them then). I had another comment recently that cycling was far too dangerous to cycle without a helmet. These arguments and this perception of the relative safety/dangerousness of cycling just did not exist before the stupid MHLs. The harm done by promoting the perceived danger of riding a bike will take decades to repair.
DS
One of my friends always tells me to wear a helmet. I guess I should listen, but she is someone who would never ride without a helmet.
-
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby high_tea » Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:18 pm
(emphasis in original)il padrone wrote:Sorry to beat the same old drum, but if the inconvenience/freedom imposition is so trivial........ why did authorities not mandate the helmet for car drivers.... for pedestrians on the street ???high_tea wrote:Secondly, it amazes me that there is any view of "freedom" that could found an objection to bicycle helmet laws in particular.
It's hard enough to figure out why a law was passed sometimes, so speculating on why some hypothetical law wasn't passed seems like an unproductive exercise. Besides, and I've pointed this out before, this is as much an argument for more regulation as MHL repeal.
There is a caveat to this, though: walking around is a fundamental expression of a basic human right. I'm extremely leery of any law that interferes with that. The bar is higher for regulating pedestrians that regulating cyclists, and rightly so. I don't know why helmets aren't mandated for pedestrians, but the fact that they aren't doesn't bother me in the slightest; it indicates neither prejudice nor inconsistency.
As for motorists: mandate away, you'll not hear a peep out of me.
-
- Posts: 14305
- Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:40 pm
- Location: Bendigo
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby warthog1 » Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:10 pm
I would prefer they didn't.high_tea wrote: As for motorists: mandate away, you'll not hear a peep out of me.
It won't improve their field of vision and may make some drivers feel more impervious to injury in their metal cage, encouraging more inconsiderate driving behaviour.
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:39 am
- Location: Kensington, Melbourne, VIC
- Contact:
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby wizdofaus » Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:30 am
I thought salmoning referred to any attempt to ride along a street in the opposite direction of the traffic flow, and I've never quite understood why some writers (e.g. bikesnobnyc) so readily condemn it. There's several one-way streets around Carlton/Fitzroy that I use to ride the "other way", usually because it is the safest route. I thought I'd read some research suggesting counter-flow bicycle lanes proved to very safe and effective when they'd be implemented in a few cities, though a quick Google isn't showing up much other than a few videos. There's even one in North Melbourne (OConnel St), though apparently it's been known to confuse drivers.il padrone wrote:Right-side running is 'salmoning'. I might not be very disapproving of helmet-less riding but such salmoning is downright dangerous to other cyclists and pedestrians.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby il padrone » Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:14 am
Yeah. like I said, riding on the right-hand side of the streetwizdofaus wrote:I thought salmoning referred to any attempt to ride along a street in the opposite direction of the traffic flow,il padrone wrote:Right-side running is 'salmoning'. I might not be very disapproving of helmet-less riding but such salmoning is downright dangerous to other cyclists and pedestrians.
Contra-flow bike lanes are fine. Commonly used in the Netherlands. Different species entirely to the 'salmons'. If it is done correct it is usually on one-way streets - regular flow of cyclists rides with normal traffic, or in a left-side lane; contra-flow cycling in a right-side lane (their left)wizdofaus wrote:I thought I'd read some research suggesting counter-flow bicycle lanes proved to very safe and effective when they'd be implemented in a few cities, though a quick Google isn't showing up much other than a few videos. There's even one in North Melbourne (OConnel St), though apparently it's been known to confuse drivers.
1. Approved and usually marked
2. Cars keep out of the way
3. Contra-flow is not riding into the face of other riders.
Or in this Dutch example - contra-flow lane on the left (their right), cars (one-way) and opposing riders on the right.
Not to be confused with two-way separated bike paths. These are used in some countries (a couple here in Melbourne) but tend to have a poor safety record - mainly due to cross-street confusion by drivers. They work in the Netherlands where drivers on minor cross-streets are usually required to give way to cyclists on bike path crossings, so the driver culture is very different.
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:39 am
- Location: Kensington, Melbourne, VIC
- Contact:
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby wizdofaus » Mon Mar 25, 2013 12:16 pm
Which I'd agree is dangerous...but my understanding was that salmoning also included riding the wrong way up a one-way street, even if it were on the correct side of the road (or in the middle, assuming no trafic).il padrone wrote:Yeah. like I said, riding on the right-hand side of the streetwizdofaus wrote:I thought salmoning referred to any attempt to ride along a street in the opposite direction of the traffic flow,il padrone wrote:Right-side running is 'salmoning'. I might not be very disapproving of helmet-less riding but such salmoning is downright dangerous to other cyclists and pedestrians.
That was why I couldn't find any hits - only Googled for "Counter-flow". Change it to "Contra-flow" and the first few results are exactly what I was looking for...Contra-flow bike lanes are fine. Commonly used in the Netherlands.
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby Mulger bill » Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:05 pm
Ummm, when salmoning, there is no correct side of the road. At least contraflow has a defined area to show peoples where they should be.wizdofaus wrote:...but my understanding was that salmoning also included riding the wrong way up a one-way street, even if it were on the correct side of the road (or in the middle, assuming no trafic
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:39 am
- Location: Kensington, Melbourne, VIC
- Contact:
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby wizdofaus » Mon Mar 25, 2013 4:12 pm
Correct as in, the side of the road you'd be on if it were a two-way street, i.e. the left side in Australia. Apparently there's actually quite a few contra-flow bike lanes in Melbourne, I assume all of them have the lane to the left of the cars coming the other way.Mulger bill wrote:Ummm, when salmoning, there is no correct side of the road. At least contraflow has a defined area to show peoples where they should be.wizdofaus wrote:...but my understanding was that salmoning also included riding the wrong way up a one-way street, even if it were on the correct side of the road (or in the middle, assuming no trafic
-
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:41 am
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby Percrime » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:17 pm
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby human909 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:30 pm
The biggest and most obvious one is Princes Park Drive which is about a kilometre. There are certainly are quite a few around Fitzroy and Collingwood. Also the north end of Lennox St Richmond.Percrime wrote:But I cant think of any one way.. wrong way down a one way street. A couple of 10 metre ones through a one way entrance into a street excepted
- Xplora
- Posts: 8272
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:33 am
- Location: TL;DR
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby Xplora » Tue Mar 26, 2013 3:55 pm
what medical reason does a religious person have that a doctor could support? ??????????????????????????
Funnily enough, even if you did have a doctors cert, the police could still fine you and you'd be required to attend court anyway
-
- Posts: 1494
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby high_tea » Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:24 pm
That very much depends on the state. Queensland has an explicit exemption: r256(4). Victoria, to pick another state at random, does not. There, "the Corporation" can issue exemptions. I can't be bothered looking up the statutory definition of "the Corporation", nor the rules in other states at the minute.Xplora wrote:Sikh bloke just managed to get another helmet fine rendered "no penalty applied"... judge said he should get a doctors cert until the law is changed...
what medical reason does a religious person have that a doctor could support? ??????????????????????????
Funnily enough, even if you did have a doctors cert, the police could still fine you and you'd be required to attend court anyway
- wurtulla wabbit
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:08 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby wurtulla wabbit » Tue Mar 26, 2013 8:51 pm
A black and white cobra pops out the top to arrest you !
Last part was a joke but first part is legit.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby il padrone » Tue Mar 26, 2013 9:57 pm
It's all a hot topic in the Commodes forum
This is the Sikh guy concerned
But hey, why is that deemed to be so dangerous?????
http://www.sikhchic.com/sports/the_sikh_motorcycle_club" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- wurtulla wabbit
- Posts: 513
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:08 pm
Re: Mandatory Helmet Laws & stuff (Was One & ONLY Helmet Thr
Postby wurtulla wabbit » Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:19 pm
Was a huge bone of contention years ago when it was brought in to allow the police force to "employ " a more equal ratio of races in the force.
Same when they (fire service) started employing 4 foot, one legged Chinese lesbians over strapping 6 foot blokes(politically correctness gone mad ) .
That's not a joke either, it happened ! (Was disabled) .
Worlds gone mad !
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Cycling Brands
- Cannondale
- Garmin
- Giant
- Shimano
- Trek
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+11:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.