Princes Bridge - send a letter
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby il padrone » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:15 am
My suggestion, if this matters to you, is to write to as many people as possible and tell them why this is a great idea and why the RACV's ideas are ludicrous. Send letters/emails to MCC, RACV, The Age, The Hun ad more.
Here is a letter I have sent:
The proposal by the Melbourne City Council to set aside as a separate bike lane on Princes Bridge is a great step forward in supporting what is the major cycling route in Melbourne, and is a long-needed facility. Thousands of cyclists commute along the very good bicycle lanes on St Kilda Rd, yet when they arrive at the Arts Centre precinct get funnelled into a 30cm wide “bike lane” over Princes Bridge. Creating a separated lane will solve this problem and stimulate great use.
Closing off a lane of traffic will not worsen congestion. The experience of other cities that have closed off vehicle access (eg Seoul, New York) is that traffic congestion does not increase.
Brian Negus’ (RACV) bridge suggestion is simply unworkable on a two-way transport route with large volumes of pedestrians walking over the west footpath of Princes Bridge. Access to and from such a bridge would involve crossing the vehicle traffic and pedestrian traffic twice.
I congratulate the Melbourne City Council on their vision for the future development of this area that is unsuitable for huge volumes of motor vehicle traffic and is increasingly a part of the pedestrian core of the city.
- VRE
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:14 am
- Location: Ringwood North, VIC, Australia
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby VRE » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:32 am
I agree that more letters would be a good idea. I just hope that if a separated lane is built, that it's done PROPERLY, and not in the usual Australian "near enough is good enough" manner . Then of course we'd have to convince pedestrians to stay out of it, a thankless task in itself.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby il padrone » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:37 am
For out-of-towners, this is what the Princes Bridge "bike lane" currently looks like. The footpath 'bike-only' path is mostly unworkable due to large pedestrian volumes and total ignorance of the bike-path markings by many pedestrians.
The point about writing letters is that this is a real milestone for the development of high quality bicycle infrastructure that could over-ride motor vehicle road space. The RACV can be expected to lobby hard on this and cyclists' and community voices need to be heard.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby human909 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:49 am
I skimmed through the Melbourne City cycling document and it really is quite good.
http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/AboutCo ... 012-16.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Build or upgrade high priority off-road routes
a) La Trobe Street Construct a physically-separated bicycle route
from Victoria Street to Adderley Street. This will
provide east-west access across the city and
improve linkages to Docklands and the western
suburbs of Melbourne.
$2.4 million January 2013
b) Swanston Street, Princes Bridge
Install chevron-separated lanes on Princes Bridge
by removing one lane of traffic. This will increase
the capacity of a major link into the central city,
improve safety and reduce pedestrian/cyclist
conflict.
$150,000 May 2013
c) Elizabeth Street (north)
Construct a physically-separated (northbound)
and chevron-separated (southbound) route
connecting Royal Parade and Flemington Road
to the central city with improved intersection
design at Victoria Street. This link will provide
access from the north to the central city and the
Queen Victoria Market. It will be completed in
collaboration with VicRoads.
$605,000 February 2013
d) Exhibition Street
Establish a bicycle route during peak hours,
northbound from Flinders Street to La Trobe
Street and southbound from La Trobe Street to
Flinders Lane. This will provide a north-south link
to the Yarra Trail.
$490,000 February 2013
e) St Kilda Road (southbound)
Construct a separated bicycle route between
Princes Bridge and Linlithgow Avenue and
Southbank Boulevard intersection. This will
increase the safety and quality of this major
north-south route.
$330,000 May 2013
f) Clarendon Street, East Melbourne
Construct a chevron-separated bicycle route
between Victoria Parade and Wellington Parade.
This route will connect Albert Street bicycle lanes
to the Yarra Trail and reduce the desire of cyclists
to ride through Fitzroy Gardens.
$400,000 September 2012
g) Cecil Street to Whiteman Street to Normanby Road
Install an improved bicycle route by adding
ramps and removing parking in Whiteman
Street and connecting cyclists to the median in
Normanby Road. This project will be completed
in consultation with stakeholders and connect to
the Cecil Street separated route within the City of
Port Phillip.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby il padrone » Mon Mar 25, 2013 10:45 am
Their "chevron-separated lanes" could be expected to look something like this (on Clarendon St, East Melbourne) minus the car-parking.VRE wrote:I agree that more letters would be a good idea. I just hope that if a separated lane is built, that it's done PROPERLY, and not in the usual Australian "near enough is good enough" manner . Then of course we'd have to convince pedestrians to stay out of it, a thankless task in itself.
- Summernight
- Posts: 2073
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby Summernight » Mon Mar 25, 2013 11:15 am
IMO, that bridge doesn't flow for cars at any time so car drivers really shouldn't bother crossing that one if they want to get into/out of the city in a quick time and I think it would be great to introduce a wider bike lane there.
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:23 pm
- Location: Perth, WA
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby Shifter » Mon Mar 25, 2013 12:19 pm
But that's only over the fairly short bridge. What happens after that?
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby human909 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 12:29 pm
I agree. However I suspect that Melbourne City and VicRoads know something us, RACV and the Herald Sun don't...Shifter wrote:That looks really easy to fix up without taking a lane of traffic, just move the kerb, raise it to seperate the peds, and pop some chevron marking as above and Robert is your mother's brother.
But that's only over the fairly short bridge. What happens after that?
That the bridge is not a bottleneck. The bottle neck is the Flinder St and Swanston St intersection. It is in all likelyhood that vehiclar traffic flow will be unaffected by narrowing the bridge to one lane.
In the meantime there are dozens of injuries on this bridge every year.....
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby il padrone » Mon Mar 25, 2013 12:38 pm
The bridge is the real bottle-neck for cyclists. Over the bridge there are two lanes plus a decent (door zone) bike lane with parking.
- Summernight
- Posts: 2073
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby Summernight » Mon Mar 25, 2013 12:39 pm
Yes, it is definitely the intersection that is the bottleneck for cars (I have no experience cycling that area so can't say the same for cycling). Well, that and the two huge pedestrian crossings.human909 wrote:I agree. However I suspect that Melbourne City and VicRoads know something us, RACV and the Herald Sun don't...Shifter wrote:That looks really easy to fix up without taking a lane of traffic, just move the kerb, raise it to seperate the peds, and pop some chevron marking as above and Robert is your mother's brother.
But that's only over the fairly short bridge. What happens after that?
That the bridge is not a bottleneck. The bottle neck is the Flinder St and Swanston St intersection. It is in all likelyhood that vehiclar traffic flow will be unaffected by narrowing the bridge to one lane.
In the meantime there are dozens of injuries on this bridge every year.....
What happens after the short bridge going towards the city is a tram/bike only Swanston Street (and some taxis and police cars). All non-authorised cars have to turn either left or right into Flinders Street- they cannot go straight ahead.
In the other direction (going away from the city) after the bridge the road widens considerably with lots of greenery between lanes.
https://maps.google.com.au/maps?q=st+ki ... 3,,0,14.23" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Although during peak hour everything is blocked up as people try to get onto the freeway entrances which are nearby.
- jules21
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: deep in the pain cave
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby jules21 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:09 pm
human has got it.human909 wrote:I agree. However I suspect that Melbourne City and VicRoads know something us, RACV and the Herald Sun don't...
That the bridge is not a bottleneck. The bottle neck is the Flinder St and Swanston St intersection. It is in all likelyhood that vehiclar traffic flow will be unaffected by narrowing the bridge to one lane.
traffic flow is like fluid flow (water) in a pipe. it flows only as fast as the narrowest section - that is almost always intersections.
this is why adding lanes to the M1 has been largely a waste of money - as the capacity for moving traffic on and off it has remained unchanged.
politicians feel pressured by uninformed voters to build monuments. 1000s of years ago it was pyramids, today it's more roads and lanes.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby il padrone » Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:17 pm
Motor vehicle traffic through there is pointless and can easily be accommodated by diversion to Kingsway, Queensbridge and Swan St Bridge to Batman Ave & Exhibition St. As has been demonstrated in other cities, closing congested road space causes minimal congestion elsewhere as people shift their travel modes and take advantage of new, more efficient options.
Robert Doyle has the right sorts of monuments in his vision.
- jules21
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: deep in the pain cave
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby jules21 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 1:25 pm
people intensely dislike being told to be "more efficient". the nature of the voter-politician relationship is one of master-servant - the servant may not tell the master he's doing it wrong and dictate a better way. voters will oppose that on principle and discard all logic in railing against it.il padrone wrote:As has been demonstrated in other cities, closing congested road space causes minimal congestion elsewhere as people shift their travel modes and take advantage of new, more efficient options.
to be fair, left to their own devices, politicians do tend to come up with some loopy policies. I can't blame voters for wanting to dictate terms. in any case, closing roads is a dangerous ploy. it may work in this case, as the voters are predominantly not the motorists who are using that road, and those who are the voters are fed up with CBD traffic congestion.
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby il padrone » Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:03 pm
jules21 wrote:people intensely dislike being told to be "more efficient". the nature of the voter-politician relationship is one of master-servant - the servant may not tell the master he's doing it wrong and dictate a better way. voters will oppose that on principle and discard all logic in railing against it.
to be fair, left to their own devices, politicians do tend to come up with some loopy policies. I can't blame voters for wanting to dictate terms. in any case, closing roads is a dangerous ploy. it may work in this case, as the voters are predominantly not the motorists who are using that road, and those who are the voters are fed up with CBD traffic congestion.
For more details of the project:
- birdbrain
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 7:16 pm
- Location: tulla melb
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby birdbrain » Mon Mar 25, 2013 2:30 pm
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby human909 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 3:08 pm
Agreed. Though I may not have been clear about the bridge being the cyclist bottleneck.il padrone wrote:Cutting out the footpath would raise the ire of the pedestrians (enter Halfa Scruloose and the Pedestrian People's Republic) and all hell would break loose. Not to mention the cost would be huge, probably run into Heritage Victoria issues as well. At peak times the bridge footpath is really fully taken up with pedestrians - why the bike-path there is so flawed.
The bridge is the real bottle-neck for cyclists. Over the bridge there are two lanes plus a decent (door zone) bike lane with parking.
-
- Posts: 1791
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 1:25 pm
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby wellington_street » Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:05 pm
Seriously?This proposal will make it worse. Cars and cyclists are not a happy mix and while cars can be a lethal weapon when drivers are impatient and frustrated in traffic, cyclists are often to blame by shouting abuse at drivers and banging on car doors.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby human909 » Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:23 pm
Yes. 23% of the 1107 cyclist crashes with injuries in the City of Melbourne was where the cyclists banged into an innocent driver's car door! Often these hits were very hard and at speed and abuse is not abnormal.wellington_street wrote:From the scumbag editorial:
Seriously?This proposal will make it worse. Cars and cyclists are not a happy mix and while cars can be a lethal weapon when drivers are impatient and frustrated in traffic, cyclists are often to blame by shouting abuse at drivers and banging on car doors.
No wonder drivers are so annoyed when their doors are being regularly attacked in this way!
http://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/AboutCo ... 012-16.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- jules21
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: deep in the pain cave
- KenGS
- Posts: 1474
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:31 pm
- Location: Rosanna, Victoria
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby KenGS » Mon Mar 25, 2013 5:48 pm
Too right. I had just parked my car and opened the door to get out when some lycra lout comes along and bangs into my door.cyclists are often to blame by shouting abuse at drivers and banging on car doors.
On another occasion, I was just driving along and turned left into a side street when some idiot cyclist bangs into my passenger side door.
- VRE
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:14 am
- Location: Ringwood North, VIC, Australia
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby VRE » Mon Mar 25, 2013 6:51 pm
I must be letting Melbourne motorists get to me, because although I tried to find that funny, I couldn't . Probably at least partly due to the unfortunate incident in NZ, though, which has made me more aware than usual of my own mortality.KenGS wrote:Too right. I had just parked my car and opened the door to get out when some lycra lout comes along and bangs into my door.cyclists are often to blame by shouting abuse at drivers and banging on car doors.
On another occasion, I was just driving along and turned left into a side street when some idiot cyclist bangs into my passenger side door.
- DavidS
- Posts: 3639
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:24 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby DavidS » Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:17 am
Just read the Hun's link. I don't believe how stupid that editorial is. Apparently closing off one lane over the bridge which leads to the intersection of Flinders and Swanston will cause congestion in, wait for it, the intersection. Huh? If there is still congestion in the intersection after the bridge then the intersection is the problem, not the bridge. I suppose they may have a point going South but the intersection is blocked in all sorts of directions anyway. What might happen if they close one of the car lanes is that less people will use the intersection of Flinders and Swanston. This would be excellent as that intersection cannot handle the traffic at all. You especially see this with cars traveling along Flinders St getting stuck in the middle of the intersection and blocking the trams on the most busy street for trams in Melbourne. Less cars in the intersection would be a great idea, take away the lane and this should be one effect.
DS
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby il padrone » Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:41 am
They edited out my criticism of the RACV's suggestion of a separate bicycle bridge though - pity
- VRE
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:14 am
- Location: Ringwood North, VIC, Australia
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby VRE » Tue Mar 26, 2013 6:38 am
The paper version of your letter (which I read just a few minutes ago) is more complete, Peter.il padrone wrote:Oooh! I got a letter published, half-way down the page. Good, hope there are more.
They edited out my criticism of the RACV's suggestion of a separate bicycle bridge though - pity
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21501
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Princes Bridge - send a letter
Postby g-boaf » Tue Mar 26, 2013 7:36 am
No - I'm not trolling or being the devils advocate. I just don't care anymore. Cycling as a community is divided badly, so while it keeps hitting the self destruct button, these articles will continue. The opponents of cycling are organised and methodical in comparison.
Return to “General Cycling Discussion”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.