More CREE LED Torch Solutions

User avatar
uncle arthur
Posts: 1387
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:45 pm
Location: Brisvegas
Contact:

More CREE LED Torch Solutions

Postby uncle arthur » Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:07 pm

On the subject of lights - following a couple of posts re DealsExtreme and the Cree torches, I purchased two of these Image.

They arrived today so I've made up a mount using a Tioga LED base, some small holes drilled through to accommodate the two zip ties, and voila.....

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

I'll let everyone know how they work out :)
What is it with cycling? 30+ kmh and lycra???!!!

User avatar
nimm
Posts: 611
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:24 am
Location: Perth

Postby nimm » Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:13 pm

Just so it's clear, even though these have Cree Q5 LED, due to being driven at lower voltage (and much lower overall power available in 1x AA) the intensity won't be matching the UltraFire C2s or similar torches driven by ~3.6V-9V (1x 18650s or 2x CR123As).

They'll still be bright and there are advantages to using the Q5 (or the R2) because they offer more light for the same power consumption - even if you're not running them to the max.

You're also going to get a lower burn time, it's about 3hrs for 1x 18650s but no idea about 1x AA in this case. Let us know how it goes.

Nice mount!
/ Giant OCR / Go Vegan /

User avatar
Kalgrm
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 9653
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: Success, WA
Contact:

Postby Kalgrm » Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:45 pm

Looking good. Let us know how they turn out (throw, brightness, etc.)

Cheers,
Graeme
Think outside the double triangle.
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....

MountGower

Postby MountGower » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:17 pm

Nimm

I really need to start paying more attention or deciding that until I can afford the time to do so I should stop asking questions. Buuuut, am I correct in assuming that these torches all have the same lamp but run at different voltages in different torches? So Graeme's head set will run brighter (per torch) that Uncle Arthur's because of his custom battery pack?
I'm not knocking Uncle Arthur's lights. Buying them and wacking them on is obviously low hassle and I'm sure they will work very well.

I'm really trying to determine what to buy myself. The torches you bought. Can I assume that they run at higher voltage and have a larger lens? Larger battery capacity? The advantage of Uncle's and Graeme's being streamline and easily bound together and good enough for the job?

Am I getting somewhere. I'm just an electrician, after all.....who obviously hasn't had or allocated sufficient time to this. So I am just going to have a bit of a bludge on this until I'm told to push on.

Oh, one more question. What is the maximum voltage we can hit these babies with without severely reducing lamp life?

I'm actually getting a little bit exited by all this super torch bizzo.

User avatar
uncle arthur
Posts: 1387
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:45 pm
Location: Brisvegas
Contact:

Postby uncle arthur » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:30 pm

There were two key reasons I chose these ones:

1 - they take AA batteries and rechargeable ones are readily available (I have a batch of Sony 2300mAh ones here).

They are small enough to be bound together in this formation.

If I want to, I'm assuming that I could potentially do as Graeme has and use my existing NiMh rechargeable batterypack for the Nightpro light, but that requires electronics knowledge of which I have very little.

So for a smile solution which gives me flexibility in terms of flash/solid beam combinations this was an easy way to go.

The light throw is excellent - one beam alone lights up the back yard, and the two together is sensational. Weight wise it is lighter than my existing Nightpro setup, and I can, if I want, now put the Nightpro as a helmet light (or sell it).

I'm yet to find out how long the rechargeables will last in the new torches, but I will advise when I know.

Oh - and the front on shot isn't of the lights actually - that's the flash reflection off the reflectors.
Last edited by uncle arthur on Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
What is it with cycling? 30+ kmh and lycra???!!!

MountGower

Postby MountGower » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:33 pm

Oh, man, how am I supposed to sleep now?

User avatar
uncle arthur
Posts: 1387
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:45 pm
Location: Brisvegas
Contact:

Postby uncle arthur » Fri Jul 11, 2008 8:49 pm

OK - here's the test shots.

Control - Frontyard
Image
Front yard - One lamp - full bright
Image
Front yard - Both lamps - full bright
Image

Control - side of house
Image
Side of house - one lamp
Image
Side of house - both lamps
Image

$50 delivered. I had the mount already.
What is it with cycling? 30+ kmh and lycra???!!!

User avatar
Kalgrm
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 9653
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:21 pm
Location: Success, WA
Contact:

Postby Kalgrm » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:36 pm

MountGower wrote:... am I correct in assuming that these torches all have the same lamp but run at different voltages in different torches? So Graeme's head set will run brighter (per torch) that Uncle Arthur's because of his custom battery pack?
My understanding (limited as it is) is that you will get similar run times run times with different voltages, but slightly brighter lights.. My bar lights will run with batteries between 3.2v and 9v, being only slightly brighter at 7.4v than they are at 3.7v. So I run mine at 3.7v to optimise run time vs brightness. My helmet lights are 1.3v to 4.2v, so the same battery pack does both lights.
The advantage of Uncle's and Graeme's being streamline and easily bound together and good enough for the job?
After I built my helmet lights, I realised they are every bit as good as my bar lights - probably even better, since the beam isn't as focussed. They would have been great as bar lights too, but I personally believe the size of the reflector helps drivers see the bike more easily. Small reflectors look like a point of light a long way away, so I think drivers might assume the tiny lights are more distant than they are. Just my opinion there.
What is the maximum voltage we can hit these babies with without severely reducing lamp life?
They are rated to a certain voltage, but it's not the lamp life which is reduced, but the controler running the LED which fries. Don't go above that voltage and they are supposed to last 5000 hours. :shock: Try to go above it and they won't last a second before the circuit board dies. There's no point trying to over-volt them anyway, since they are incredibly bright within the range specified. I had grand plans of putting 7.4v through them, but soon realised 3.7v is more than enough and the battery is half the weight for the same run time and similar brightness.
uncle arthur wrote:If I want to, I'm assuming that I could potentially do as Graeme has and use my existing NiMh rechargeable batterypack for the Nightpro light, but that requires electronics knowledge of which I have very little.
I have next to no electronics knowledge. I just soldered a couple of wires in place and hooked them to some connectors. If I can do it, you can too. Really. It's that easy.

Cheers,
Graeme
Think outside the double triangle.
---------------------
Music was better when ugly people were allowed to make it ....

User avatar
nimm
Posts: 611
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:24 am
Location: Perth

Postby nimm » Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:16 pm

Light output is a function of the LED, driver, and input voltage. Some of the reviews on dealextreme include people that have done testing. I've seen some tests with small V increments looking at power draw and light output. With the lights we have they increase rapidly (light output) up to around 6V then drop/flatten a bit. Usually using more power for no gain at that point.
/ Giant OCR / Go Vegan /

Dale E Grind
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm

Postby Dale E Grind » Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:05 pm

nimm wrote:Light output is a function of the LED, driver, and input voltage. Some of the reviews on dealextreme include people that have done testing. I've seen some tests with small V increments looking at power draw and light output. With the lights we have they increase rapidly (light output) up to around 6V then drop/flatten a bit. Usually using more power for no gain at that point.
How would one go about using a dynamo hub as the power source for something like this?

Pushy
Posts: 994
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:02 am
Location: Freo WA

Postby Pushy » Wed Jul 16, 2008 10:31 pm

Dale E Grind wrote:
How would one go about using a dynamo hub as the power source for something like this?[/quote]
I'm sure it can be done, what you'll need to know is the specifications of your hub to know what or how many lights you can drive

Les

beebleb
Posts: 130
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:07 am
Location: Perth, WA

Postby beebleb » Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:10 pm

Out of interest, have you had a chance to ride this through some serious rain yet? Thinking of buying one :D

Pushy
Posts: 994
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:02 am
Location: Freo WA

Postby Pushy » Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:07 pm

beebleb wrote:Out of interest, have you had a chance to ride this through some serious rain yet? Thinking of buying one :D
If you intend to ride in the rain with these then I would suggest some additional precautions. Sealing the lens with some silicone or an o-ring if the head can be disassembled and some vaseline on all the threads. I have been cought in some downpours and the only ill effects is some moisture behind the lens.

Les

User avatar
uncle arthur
Posts: 1387
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:45 pm
Location: Brisvegas
Contact:

Postby uncle arthur » Sat Jul 26, 2008 8:28 pm

Pushy wrote:
beebleb wrote:Out of interest, have you had a chance to ride this through some serious rain yet? Thinking of buying one :D
If you intend to ride in the rain with these then I would suggest some additional precautions. Sealing the lens with some silicone or an o-ring if the head can be disassembled and some vaseline on all the threads. I have been cought in some downpours and the only ill effects is some moisture behind the lens.

Les
The head on these cannot (it would appear) be disassembled and the battery cap does seal with an o-ring, to which I have added a smear of vaseline.
What is it with cycling? 30+ kmh and lycra???!!!

Rajik
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 12:39 am

Re: More CREE LED Torch Solutions

Postby Rajik » Sun May 19, 2013 12:43 am

uncle arthur wrote:On the subject of lights - following a couple of posts re DealsExtreme and the Cree torches, I purchased two of these Image.

They arrived today so I've made up a mount using a Tioga LED base, some small holes drilled through to accommodate the two zip ties, and voila.....

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

I'll let everyone know how they work out :)
Let me know more about the battery power and warranty if it has.

eeksll
Posts: 2631
Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:36 pm

Re:

Postby eeksll » Sun May 19, 2013 4:24 pm

Dale E Grind wrote:How would one go about using a dynamo hub as the power source for something like this?
What sort of dynamo hub do you have? and have you looked at actual dynamo lights?

I started with the ultrafire WF-503B (run off 18650 battery) there was a stage where I was using 2 of them. I currently run ayups (helmet mounted) and a dynamo light (Busch + Müller Lumotec IQ Cyo Senso Plus). IMO, without the ayups on, the dynamo light lacks the "wow" factor but it has soooo much more usable riding light than the ultrafire.

If i did not get the ayups first, I would not have got them, but the ayups do have other advantage e.g night running and helmet mount is just very nice to have on a unlit bike path.

User avatar
MattyK
Posts: 3257
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 1:07 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: More CREE LED Torch Solutions

Postby MattyK » Sun May 19, 2013 6:31 pm

Random thread dredge by a first poster. Looks trustworthy...

FWIW 5 year old LED tech will be well out of date by now.

kukamunga
Posts: 3540
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:12 am
Location: 3166

Re: More CREE LED Torch Solutions

Postby kukamunga » Tue May 21, 2013 2:43 am


User avatar
InTheWoods
Posts: 1900
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:34 pm
Location: Brisbane

Re: More CREE LED Torch Solutions

Postby InTheWoods » Thu May 23, 2013 10:14 am

MattyK wrote:Random thread dredge by a first poster. Looks trustworthy...

FWIW 5 year old LED tech will be well out of date by now.
Haha. Yeh. He modified the quoted link in his second post to point at a different website :)

User avatar
barefoot
Posts: 1203
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:05 am
Location: Ballarat

Re: More CREE LED Torch Solutions

Postby barefoot » Thu May 23, 2013 11:59 am

MattyK wrote:Random thread dredge by a first poster. Looks trustworthy...

FWIW 5 year old LED tech will be well out of date by now.
True.

But, FWIW, 1xAA power-LED torches are even cheaper now.

I got three similar Cree (or Luxeon or something) torches off DX years ago. After lots and lots of use, one of them is starting to get a bit dicky, so I just bought three more similar for about $10 each.

I currently have one of each generation on my commuter; on first outing, it seems the new one is noticeably brighter than the old. That could be due to degradation of the old one (do they do that?), improved emitter or driver technology, even just manufacturing tolerance (one of my original three was always a little bit dimmer than the others).

I attach them to my bar using these velcro mounts: http://dx.com/p/universal-adjustable-bi ... eter-31871" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Obviously, these are not hardcore OMGWTF bright lights. They're just for commuting on lit streets. I use a Magicshine for rides in the proper dark.

tim

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users