RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
- sumgy
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
- Contact:
RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby sumgy » Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:00 pm
Also on their Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/racqofficial" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Which has brought out the same old tired arguments that we should pay rego etc etc etc.
Some serious lack of understanding of the road rules shown in the Facebook comments.
- trailgumby
- Posts: 15469
- Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
- Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
- Contact:
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby trailgumby » Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:26 pm
- queequeg
- Posts: 6483
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:09 am
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby queequeg » Sat Jul 13, 2013 6:57 pm
- sumgy
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby sumgy » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:01 pm
queequeg wrote:My IQ just dropped reading those comments. Some people need to be licensed to breathe!
- skull
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby skull » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:34 pm
He may be a poster on this forum.trailgumby wrote:Loved the comment from the guy who tried to pay rego but had his cheque returned.
EDIT: Just checked, not him but there is a poster on BNA who tried that in Tassie
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby Mulger bill » Sat Jul 13, 2013 7:41 pm
It's almost worth logging into faceache just to troll a little, almost.
London Boy 29/12/2011
- ozzymac
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:14 pm
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby ozzymac » Sat Jul 13, 2013 10:02 pm
I couldn't resist going on and adding my 2c to a certain female pot stirrer on there. Holy crap those sort of people really give me the s....tsMulger bill wrote:The actual page was well done IMO.
It's almost worth logging into faceache just to troll a little, almost.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-P5110 using Tapatalk 2
- ldrcycles
- Posts: 9594
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:19 pm
- Location: Kin Kin, Queensland
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby ldrcycles » Sat Jul 13, 2013 10:07 pm
- sumgy
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby sumgy » Sat Jul 13, 2013 10:14 pm
That woman is unhinged.ozzymac wrote:I couldn't resist going on and adding my 2c to a certain female pot stirrer on there. Holy crap those sort of people really give me the s....tsMulger bill wrote:The actual page was well done IMO.
It's almost worth logging into faceache just to troll a little, almost.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-P5110 using Tapatalk 2
- ozzymac
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:14 pm
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby ozzymac » Sat Jul 13, 2013 10:58 pm
sumgy wrote:That woman is unhinged.ozzymac wrote:I couldn't resist going on and adding my 2c to a certain female pot stirrer on there. Holy crap those sort of people really give me the s....tsMulger bill wrote:The actual page was well done IMO.
It's almost worth logging into faceache just to troll a little, almost.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-P5110 using Tapatalk 2
You could say that.....
Cheers
Sent from my GT-P5110 using Tapatalk 2
- ozzymac
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:14 pm
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby ozzymac » Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:00 pm
Cheers
Sent from my GT-P5110 using Tapatalk 2
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby il padrone » Sat Jul 13, 2013 11:41 pm
Been and done that now ShaunMulger bill wrote:The actual page was well done IMO.
It's almost worth logging into faceache just to troll a little, almost.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- sumgy
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby sumgy » Sun Jul 14, 2013 7:06 am
Good work.il padrone wrote:Been and done that now ShaunMulger bill wrote:The actual page was well done IMO.
It's almost worth logging into faceache just to troll a little, almost.
I am Stephen if anyone is wondering.
- sumgy
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby sumgy » Sun Jul 14, 2013 9:49 am
In QLD, I would say they have done better than ALL of them.ldrcycles wrote:Ironic that a motoring organisation is doing a better job of advocating cyclist's rights than most cycling organisations .
- skull
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby skull » Sun Jul 14, 2013 10:30 am
Joe Bloggs has fired a couple from the hip as well nowsumgy wrote:Good work.il padrone wrote:Been and done that now ShaunMulger bill wrote:The actual page was well done IMO.
It's almost worth logging into faceache just to troll a little, almost.
I am Stephen if anyone is wondering.
- queequeg
- Posts: 6483
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:09 am
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby queequeg » Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:01 pm
People like this actually believe what they say. Checking the facts is not something they are likely to ever do, even when those facts are quoted for them verbatim. They'll just deflect the argument to something else.
- sumgy
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby sumgy » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:30 pm
- skull
- Posts: 2087
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby skull » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:34 pm
- sumgy
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby sumgy » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:37 pm
All of the replies to her posts have gone when she deleted her own posts.skull wrote:Is it just me or have there been a large amount of posts deleted. Looks like the woman has realised she was being a clown and has retracted her comments.
- ozzymac
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 6:14 pm
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby ozzymac » Sun Jul 14, 2013 1:51 pm
I wonder if RACQ deleted her, probably thought she was being too much of a moron motorist.sumgy wrote:All of the replies to her posts have gone when she deleted her own posts.skull wrote:Is it just me or have there been a large amount of posts deleted. Looks like the woman has realised she was being a clown and has retracted her comments.
Cheers
Sent from my GT-P5110 using Tapatalk 2
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby Mulger bill » Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:35 pm
Nice one ladssumgy wrote:Good work.il padrone wrote:Been and done that now ShaunMulger bill wrote:The actual page was well done IMO.
It's almost worth logging into faceache just to troll a little, almost.
I am Stephen if anyone is wondering.
I'm a bit sad that lady is gone. I WAS looking forward hiding under my bridge today
Oh Yeah. Bit mean to say she's unhinged people, poor form. The correct descriptor is "bat shed crazy".
London Boy 29/12/2011
- sumgy
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby sumgy » Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:49 pm
Cant use the description I have for her here.Mulger bill wrote:
Nice one lads
I'm a bit sad that lady is gone. I WAS looking forward hiding under my bridge today
Oh Yeah. Bit mean to say she's unhinged people, poor form. The correct descriptor is "bat shed crazy".
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10599
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: RACQ clarifies cyclists and motorists’ road-share rules
Postby find_bruce » Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:50 pm
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.