Are these parts considered retro?

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:09 am

dubrat wrote:no worries but just make sure you head to your lbs and grab some Ti specific grease... The whole diameter should be covered in grease for installation


Also for the stem I would be looking for a Ibis or Litespeed Ti quill stem... would look awesome
Ooops, thanks. I didn't know that I need to use Ti-specific grease. I will get it this arvo.
Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:11 am

:cry: Those Ti stem will cost more than my frame,
Image

dubrat
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:11 pm

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby dubrat » Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:23 am

hahaha nah I have picked up my 2 for under a 100 bucks

just keep an eye on ebay

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:26 am

dubrat wrote:hahaha nah I have picked up my 2 for under a 100 bucks

just keep an eye on ebay
Probably no Ti stem for now. servicimo gave me a very good deal on the alloy quill set and they are on their way now
Image

User avatar
Dan
Posts: 3289
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:32 pm
Location: Vegas, baby

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Dan » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:38 pm


User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:55 pm

Isn't it fun Dan?
Image

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby munga » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:02 pm

no, it's retarded.

if we want to see the users profile, we can click on their name.

(apologies if i offended anyone with the use of 'retarded')

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:07 pm

munga wrote:no, it's retarded.

if we want to see the users profile, we can click on their name.

(apologies if i offended anyone with the use of 'retarded')
:lol: just trying to make it easy, as sometimes, the profile name is on another page. That will save you time to look for it.
Image

User avatar
Dan
Posts: 3289
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:32 pm
Location: Vegas, baby

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Dan » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:22 pm

The profile name is never on another page.

<------------ It's over there. Anyway, what's the point?

User avatar
im_no_pro
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 6029
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 10:29 pm
Location: Geelong

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby im_no_pro » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:29 pm

Dan wrote:The profile name is never on another page.

<------------ It's over there. Anyway, what's the point?
It is if the poster hasnt contributed on the current page. Although I agree, dont see the point. But hey, each to their own 8)

Nice looking rig. Get that quill stem happening.
master6 wrote: Moderators are like Club Handicappers; I often think they are wrong, but I dont want the job.

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:29 pm

Dan wrote:The profile name is never on another page.

<------------ It's over there. Anyway, what's the point?
Let us move on!
Image

User avatar
Velo13
Posts: 898
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:24 pm
Location: Lennox

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Velo13 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:30 pm

dubrat wrote:Also for the stem I would be looking for a Ibis or Litespeed Ti quill stem... would look awesome
Or one of those Italmanubri (ITM) tigged chrome ones ....

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:32 pm

Velo13 wrote:
dubrat wrote:Also for the stem I would be looking for a Ibis or Litespeed Ti quill stem... would look awesome
Or one of those Italmanubri (ITM) tigged chrome ones ....
Will these parts work?

Image
Image
Image

User avatar
Velo13
Posts: 898
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 3:24 pm
Location: Lennox

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Velo13 » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:35 pm

rheicel wrote: lol, I just thought I will be able to come up with a modern look retro (most likely a bad idea after all)
Looking great to my peepers, though those silly black skinny wheels need replacing with some silver alloy clinchulars. Kinlin XR-300s (on those Reynolds) are quite un-retro and ride quite harsh .... :wink:

yes, that bar and stem will work v nicely. Get the glue off the stem, and it's prolly pretty good underneath.

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:56 pm

Velo13 wrote:
rheicel wrote: lol, I just thought I will be able to come up with a modern look retro (most likely a bad idea after all)
Looking great to my peepers, though those silly black skinny wheels need replacing with some silver alloy clinchulars. Kinlin XR-300s (on those Reynolds) are quite un-retro and ride quite harsh .... :wink:
:D wheels are coming.... .. .yey! Bank is broke at the moment, will need more time to really complete this build (brown saddle with brown saddle bag, brown leather bar tape, and gum walled tyres)
Wheels are coming next....
Bar/Quill Stem/Spacer are also coming...

I will post pics when they arrive. Thanks again Velo13 for building the wheels for me. I know they will look awesome!

By the way, today's ride is my first ride with downtube shifter. They are interesting and works well above than my expectation. Shifting is a breeze and even the old 105 rear derailleur is working like brand new!
Image

User avatar
singlespeedscott
Posts: 5510
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:35 pm
Location: Elimbah, Queensland

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby singlespeedscott » Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:03 pm

rheicel wrote: By the way, today's ride is my first ride with downtube shifter. They are interesting and works well above than my expectation. Shifting is a breeze and even the old 105 rear derailleur is working like brand new!
Why are so many surprised by how well they work. They had only been in use for 60 years before the introduction of STI. :lol:
Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:12 pm

singlespeedscott wrote: Why are so many surprised by how well they work. They had only been in use for 60 years before the introduction of STI. :lol:
I have only ridden BMX when I was young, then a Fix Gear, Mountain Bike and then a Road Bike with thumb shifters and STI's. I now wonder how much complication they have introduced in the bicycle drive trains particularly the shifters when the old method works really well.

Set-up is also very easy, set the limit screws on the derailleurs and the bike is ready to roll. So simple!
Image

dubrat
Posts: 453
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 4:11 pm

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby dubrat » Wed Jul 17, 2013 4:54 pm

munga wrote:no, it's retarded.

if we want to see the users profile, we can click on their name.

(apologies if i offended anyone with the use of 'retarded')
easy Mungbean....

fired up today because of Origin

User avatar
munga
Posts: 7023
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:17 pm
Location: wowe
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby munga » Wed Jul 17, 2013 5:18 pm

friedchickenlander!

User avatar
Dan
Posts: 3289
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:32 pm
Location: Vegas, baby

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Dan » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:37 pm

State of Origin is pretty retro. Short shorts, etc.

User avatar
Kermit TF
Posts: 370
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 8:52 pm
Location: Canbrrra

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby Kermit TF » Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:55 pm

Pfffft canetoads and Mal Smellmefinga....
Go the blues....... :?
When in doubt......mumble.

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Wed Jul 17, 2013 10:03 pm

Wheels are coming. Thanks XLR8

Image

Image
Image

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:04 pm

Before and after...


Image

Image
Image
Image

User avatar
QuangVuong
Posts: 1794
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:04 pm
Location: Villawood, Sydney

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby QuangVuong » Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:13 pm

Much better! Are you one of those people who run the brakes backwards? Left lever for front and right lever for rear?

I guess this is ready for Saturday?
VillaVelo, by the Vuong brothers

Blog: https://villaveloframes.wordpress.com/
FB & IG: @villaveloframes

User avatar
rheicel
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 5:01 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

Re: Are these parts considered retro?

Postby rheicel » Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:21 pm

QuangVuong wrote:Much better! Are you one of those people who run the brakes backwards? Left lever for front and right lever for rear?

I guess this is ready for Saturday?
Yep, Left/Front and Right/Rear for me. Should be ready on Saturday. I am not happy with the headset, it looks crap imo. I will also ask you about polishing on saturday. See you!
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users