toolonglegs wrote:The old "I did it once and never touched it again"
My thoughts exactly...
More like... "I did it once, that you all know about & that I got busted for"
Latest Reviews and Articles
Postby JohnJoyner » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:50 pm
toolonglegs wrote:The old "I did it once and never touched it again"
Postby biker jk » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:52 pm
Purt wrote:biker jk wrote:French Senate releases positive EPO cases from 1998 TdF.
It's sad that it has to come to this to get O'grady to confess. He would have happily played along acting like it had never happened if this didn't come out. It's also sad that these results have been known since around 2005 but they've just been sitting on them.
I was actually expecting and a bit surprised Jens Voigt wasn't named.
Postby Zynster » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:57 pm
JohnJoyner wrote:toolonglegs wrote:The old "I did it once and never touched it again"
My thoughts exactly...
More like... "I did it once, that you all know about & that I got busted for"
Postby scotto » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:07 pm
The 2nd Womble wrote:My thoughts?......THANKYOU Cadel. Please lead the way for the next generation. Winning means showtime to us. Coming midfield and having sweated blood for a result means everything!"......
Postby toolonglegs » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:12 pm
sogood wrote:Out.
http://m.smh.com.au/sport/cycling/stuar ... 2qk04.html
A bit of a shock to those who championed O'Grady for so long. Do people now believe that he has not used it (or any other forms of PED) since? Let's just face it, it was a time of dope vs dope. Morality within the professional league just isn't worth discussing.
Postby clackers » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:13 pm
scotto wrote:
i dont care much about the others, but Cadel has shown how races are won cleanly.
Postby clackers » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:16 pm
toolonglegs wrote: He rode as a stagiare for a big Italian team, but when he realized "what was required" to go fully pro he pulled the pin and gave up.
Postby find_bruce » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:28 pm
clackers wrote:toolonglegs wrote: He rode as a stagiare for a big Italian team, but when he realized "what was required" to go fully pro he pulled the pin and gave up.
These are guys Tyler Hamilton felt sorry for. Those too honest to be team players.
Postby sogood » Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:39 pm
toolonglegs wrote:I shared a room for two weeks with a lovely Italian chap, a few years younger than me... He was good, good enough to do the baby giro, 4 times Tuscan champ and Italian age group champ... He rode as a stagiare for a big Italian team, but when he realized "what was required" to go fully pro he pulled the pin and gave up.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
Postby RonK » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:02 pm
find_bruce wrote:Just like Zabel - I used epo in 1996 & never again
Postby twizzle » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:05 pm
find_bruce wrote:clackers wrote:toolonglegs wrote: He rode as a stagiare for a big Italian team, but when he realized "what was required" to go fully pro he pulled the pin and gave up.
These are guys Tyler Hamilton felt sorry for. Those too honest to be team players.
No doubt guys like this are the victims of doping & it is appropriate for people to acknowledge that. But lets get a little bit real here - it sits very poorly with me for a person such as Hamilton who was one of the perpetrators of doping fraud to now say that he feels sorry for his own victims. Had he been honest when caught in 2004 instead of making BS excuses about a dead twin, would the whole sorry saga have dragged on for another 8 years ?
Postby sogood » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:13 pm
clackers wrote:scotto wrote:i dont care much about the others, but Cadel has shown how races are won cleanly.
Scotto, if we've learned anything, it's not to elevate anyone to sainthood status ... makes it awkward if they later have to give "that" press conference.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
Postby jules21 » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:31 pm
sogood wrote:In comparison, what's happening on the pro-MTB side of things? Hasn't been as big as on the road side. Are they "cleaner"?
Postby sogood » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:38 pm
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
Postby singlespeedscott » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:39 pm
Postby toolonglegs » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:45 pm
jules21 wrote:sogood wrote:In comparison, what's happening on the pro-MTB side of things? Hasn't been as big as on the road side. Are they "cleaner"?
i have no specific info, but having read books by Hamilton and Millar, they are clear that the oxygenating(?) enhancing doping techniques, which are where the real gains are, are most beneficial in aiding recovery in long events - e.g. 3 week tours.
MTB at the top level is mostly raced over 2 hours or so. Millar claimed that it was possible to beat EPO-fuelled riders in shorter events, but not in the 3rd week of a grand tour.
so i'd guess this is why MTB is likely cleaner - rather than that they are a nicer bunch of blokes.
Postby BastardSheep » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:53 pm
singlespeedscott wrote:As stated by others, I think very few pro cyclists at the top level in the 80's, 90's and 00's didn't dope.
Postby sogood » Thu Jul 25, 2013 4:13 pm
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
Postby Joeblake » Thu Jul 25, 2013 4:44 pm
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:18 pm
sogood wrote:Thanks Jules. I guess there's less money flowing through the MTB circuit also.
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:19 pm
sogood wrote:It was actually easier to watch back then, when the peloton doped en mass. The winner will still be the stronger rider. Now, only the very few on the big dollar technology cutting edge may gain that advantage.
Postby jules21 » Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:26 pm
Alex Simmons/RST wrote:sogood wrote:It was actually easier to watch back then, when the peloton doped en mass. The winner will still be the stronger rider. Now, only the very few on the big dollar technology cutting edge may gain that advantage.
The winner back then was the best responder to the best doping.
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:32 pm
Joeblake wrote:I try and keep a sense of proportion. I don't condone the use of drugs in any sport, but firstly, it was in 1998, when circumstances of testing were different. Secondly, I'll be prepared to give Stewie the presumption of innocence when he says he didn't do it again.
Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:35 pm
jules21 wrote:Alex Simmons/RST wrote:sogood wrote:It was actually easier to watch back then, when the peloton doped en mass. The winner will still be the stronger rider. Now, only the very few on the big dollar technology cutting edge may gain that advantage.
The winner back then was the best responder to the best doping.
i know people will disagree with me, but the winner now is arguably the person with the best genetic attributes. is that really any better? doping is bad as it's dangerous to riders' health, but i'm unconvinced for reasons beyond that.
Postby toolonglegs » Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:42 pm
Alex Simmons/RST wrote:Joeblake wrote:I try and keep a sense of proportion. I don't condone the use of drugs in any sport, but firstly, it was in 1998, when circumstances of testing were different. Secondly, I'll be prepared to give Stewie the presumption of innocence when he says he didn't do it again.
Yeah, except for the fact that his claimed one and only use of EPO was before the Tour, and he said "smashed them" when the Festina Affair broke (on 15 July Festina team hotel searched and 2 officials were taken into police custody) but his EPO positive was detected from a sample provided at the end of the second week of the Tour (26 July). Detection time is 2-3 days after stopping use.
Return to “International and National Tours and Events”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
The largest cycling discussion forum in Australia for all things bike; from new riders to seasoned bike nuts, the Australian Cycling Forums are a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.