Cycling road rules changes
-
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 7:12 pm
- Location: Albany. 400km South of Perth
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby John Lewis » Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:33 am
John
- rolandp
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:47 am
- Location: Hillarys - Perth, WA
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby rolandp » Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:53 am
BTAWA provided a response to the proposed changes back in April 2011 which included a comment that other sections needed to be adjusted including the issue of reflectors on pedals. It is disappointing that we have to go through this excercise once again. No time lines provided by DoT when this additional review will occur?Aushiker wrote:Hi
An update. Well I got a response, not from Troy Buswell of course (does this guy actually exist other than on TV? * Anyway the full response from Mr Waldock the Director General of the Department of Transport, a very detailed response as you would expect given the effort gone into writing to the Minister in the first place , can be found here. In summary, Mr Waldock has responded:
DoT is aware that some inconsistencies between the Regulations and the Code remain and that other provisions may be out of date in relation to advances in modern bicycle design.
DoT is planning a further review of the Code and Regulations with a view to repealing unused or irrelevant regulations. The issues you have raised in relation to Regulation 224 of the Code will be considered as part of this process. DoT also
intends to host public and stakeholder consultation sessions in conducting the review.
* Interesting that the Minister for Police and Road Safety, Rob Johnston can sign his own mail, whereas Troy Buswell doesn't bother to reply. I notice that the Fremantle Herald is also getting the same treatment so I am right up there in the MInister's pecking order
Regards
Andrew
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22401
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby Aushiker » Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:59 am
No time linesrolandp wrote:BTAWA provided a response to the proposed changes back in April 2011 which included a comment that other sections needed to be adjusted including the issue of reflectors on pedals. It is disappointing that we have to go through this excercise once again. No time lines provided by DoT when this additional review will occur?
Yes very disappointing that they couldn't do a proper review in the first place.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
-
- Posts: 840
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:16 pm
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby fixed » Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:07 am
How much did this flustercuck cost the taxpayer for no beneficial result?
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22401
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby Aushiker » Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:14 am
and apparently it is the previous Labour governments fault if the comment on my blog is anything to go by. Nothing like blame shifting. It would be just nice if they simply got the regulations sorted out and treated cyclists with a little more consideration. Not to much to ask is it?fixed wrote:Incompetent by DoT, they went in with their own agenda, ignored public submissions or changing the scope beyond their agenda, and then dont get their own changes ratified.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- casual_cyclist
- Posts: 7758
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:41 am
- Location: Kewdale
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby casual_cyclist » Thu Dec 22, 2011 5:28 pm
Just trying to balance our some of your government bashing Andrew!Aushiker wrote:and apparently it is the previous Labour governments fault if the comment on my blog is anything to go by. Nothing like blame shifting. It would be just nice if they simply got the regulations sorted out and treated cyclists with a little more consideration. Not to much to ask is it?fixed wrote:Incompetent by DoT, they went in with their own agenda, ignored public submissions or changing the scope beyond their agenda, and then dont get their own changes ratified.
Andrew
I was particularly responding to your claim that the government should have got this review right the first time. Considering the labor government amended the Traffic Code 21 times while they were in power, it seems odd that would accuse this government of "not getting it right the first time".
That being said, I agree that the regulation in question is stupid and that it should be changed.
So what do we need to do to get it changed? I assume Department of Transport is conducting a review of the Traffic Code? If so, when are public submissions being accepted and where do we send them? Are there any other issues that need to be addressed? If so, I will make a submission outlining the issues. The more people writing in the better.
Would there be any value in contacting the opposition Transport Minister to see if the opposition can "encourage" the government to see that the necessary amendments are made to the code?
- Aushiker
- Posts: 22401
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:55 pm
- Location: Walyalup land
- Contact:
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby Aushiker » Thu Dec 22, 2011 6:55 pm
The review I was referring to was the one undertaken this year which in my view should have sorted these discrepancies in the two regulations (I thought I had linked to my post on that review), instead we now have to have a second review to look at the aspects not sorted out the first time round.casual_cyclist wrote:I was particularly responding to your claim that the government should have got this review right the first time. Considering the labor government amended the Traffic Code 21 times while they were in power, it seems odd that would accuse this government of "not getting it right the first time".
You are correct but in that it shouldn't have happened at all given the Traffic Code was in place in 2000 and the Bicycle regulations first came in 2002.
Andrew
Aushiker.com
- casual_cyclist
- Posts: 7758
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 11:41 am
- Location: Kewdale
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby casual_cyclist » Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:43 pm
Looking back at the history of the amendments to the Traffic Code it looks like it is amended a lot... up to 4 times a year! Can it be that hard to get right?Aushiker wrote:The review I was referring to was the one undertaken this year which in my view should have sorted these discrepancies in the two regulations (I thought I had linked to my post on that review), instead we now have to have a second review to look at the aspects not sorted out the first time round.casual_cyclist wrote:I was particularly responding to your claim that the government should have got this review right the first time. Considering the labor government amended the Traffic Code 21 times while they were in power, it seems odd that would accuse this government of "not getting it right the first time".
You are correct but in that it shouldn't have happened at all given the Traffic Code was in place in 2000 and the Bicycle regulations first came in 2002.
Andrew
Anway, it would be good if people could post what should be amended so that we can make as many submissions as possible: individually, through the BTA and Cycling WA etc and Bicycle Clubs. The more submissions the better.
- rolandp
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:47 am
- Location: Hillarys - Perth, WA
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby rolandp » Thu Jun 06, 2013 11:59 pm
Why wasn't the type of engine defined in the regulation change back in 2011, and DoT (aka Bike West) would not have to be sending out e-mails reminding us that petrol engines may exceed the legal limit of what is classified as a power assisted pedal cycle and can be legally ridden on cycling infrastructure?If you’re thinking of buying a petrol-powered bicycle or modifying an existing one, you may like to consider the following information before making your purchase.
The maximum legal wattage for a Power-assisted bike which is allowed on shared paths is 200 watts. Although it is difficult to estimate the exact power output in watts of a petrol powered 49cc motor (one of the smallest known petrol motors to be on the market), it has been estimated that it is a minimum of 1000 watts.
The power output of these bikes classifies them as ‘motorcycles’ and they need to be registered and ridden by a licensed rider and only on the road. For more information about importing vehicles into Australia please see page 13 of the Importing Vehicles into Australia booklet.
Given that I was overtaken by an electric bike this evening, travelling up hill, and he wasn't pedalling, there may be some electric powered bikes who may also be exceeding the 200 watt limit.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:08 am
- Location: Perth
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby Marmoset » Fri Jun 07, 2013 4:12 pm
Given that these things are esentially "motor" vehicles, shouldn't there be some sort of greater liability in an accident when riding one?
-
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 7:40 pm
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby citywomble » Fri Jun 07, 2013 8:32 pm
In the event there was an accident (assuming they did not hit and run and got away) then there would be serious consequences for the rider. The list could be quite extensive:Given that these things are esentially "motor" vehicles, shouldn't there be some sort of greater liability in an accident when riding one?
Driving (riding) an unlicensed motor vehicle
In control of an unroadworthy vehicle (no compliance certification)
Driving without a licence (unless holding one then goodbye to that)
No registration and insurance
Driving a motor bike on a shared path
Failing to wear an approved motorcycle helmet
Reckless riding
And that's just for riding it. That would be taken into account in the event of any accident and, by that time, there would be very little scope for defending more serious charges. Potentially a very large and heavy book being thrown at them.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 11:48 pm
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby HB » Fri Jun 07, 2013 10:36 pm
- rolandp
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:47 am
- Location: Hillarys - Perth, WA
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby rolandp » Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:51 pm
Glad to see this was resolved at the Supreme Court, but really, do we need this level of judgement on what should be a easy decision? The guy is doing 65km/h, on a "death trap", and if a magistrate can't determine that this is wrong, then something is wrong with the regulations or the way they are interrupted.A disqualified driver whom police found riding a motorised bicycle could be convicted for driving without a licence after prosecutors won an appeal against his acquittal.
Within weeks of being disqualified last year, Roderick Alexander Baird had been getting around in Kardinya on the bike when he was stopped and charged with using an unlicensed vehicle and driving a motor vehicle while unauthorised.
A Perth magistrate cleared him after testimony from a motorcycle mechanic. The mechanic described the bicycle as a "death trap", with an engine held to the frame by two bolts and which could do 65km/h.
But he also agreed, when asked by the magistrate, that the bike could be described as a "power-assisted pedal cycle".
A licence is not needed for such bikes.
Supreme Court Justice Stephen Hall last week overturned the acquittal, pointing out only motorised cycles with a maximum power of 200 watts could be described as "power-assisted pedal cycles".
-
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:21 am
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
- Contact:
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby eldavo » Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:19 am
If the prosecution did not anticipate the mistake or some ignorance to the law, failed to run through the rules and make it clear to the magistrate, then the magistrate may have (insert any number of mysterious things) ending with taking the professional opinion of the motorcycle mechanic. It could also be a gross mistake and the appeal process is intended to catch those instances. Hopefully a very quick one given prosecution would have been able to prepare the appeal and make it very clear as to the mistake.
From a traffic motorcycle cop I know, the stereotype of lost license gets petrol bicycle is dominant. One had removed the pedals, presumably fitting foot pegs like a motorcycle, but still protested it being legal as it was being seized.
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:15 pm
Perhaps the regs should have a range o f alternatives. For instance I have retro-reflective tape on the cranks, front, rear and sides. It's visibility is an improvement over most fitted reflectors IMO. Possibly others have further options that are effective.
And there are far too many up-sides to clipless pedals, including safety, to warrant not using them.
- nickobec
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:51 am
- Location: Perth or 42km south as the singlespeed flies
- Contact:
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby nickobec » Thu Jul 18, 2013 9:40 pm
Had a similar experience on the PSP a couple of months ago, got passed my a electric mtb coming out from under canning bridge and he almost ran into a couple of peds.Marmoset wrote:I was passed last week by an electric bike probably doing well over 40km/h when you consider how easily he passed me and was wondering what the limit was. The thing that really struck me though was the totally blase way in which overtaking moves were carried out, in a kind of "out of my way plebs, I'm faster than you" manner which forced everyone else to account for the lack of space due to oncoming cycles.
Sitting bolt upright, barely pedalling and into the headwind at close to 40kph. Definitely more than 200 watts there. I was pumping out over 300 watts in a far more aerodynamic position at 37kph and he was just pulling away
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:02 pm
I see it often. Regular cyclists too but I perceive e-bikes as more extreme or more common. I am not sure however if I just notice them more as someone at a fast clip without pedaling has a sufficiently "wrong" look that it does tend to draw the attention.nickobec wrote:Had a similar experience on the PSP a couple of months ago, got passed my a electric mtb coming out from under canning bridge and he almost ran into a couple of peds.Marmoset wrote:I was passed last week by an electric bike probably doing well over 40km/h when you consider how easily he passed me and was wondering what the limit was. The thing that really struck me though was the totally blase way in which overtaking moves were carried out, in a kind of "out of my way plebs, I'm faster than you" manner which forced everyone else to account for the lack of space due to oncoming cycles.
Sitting bolt upright, barely pedalling and into the headwind at close to 40kph. Definitely more than 200 watts there. I was pumping out over 300 watts in a far more aerodynamic position at 37kph and he was just pulling away
Coincidentally I did have one this morning that was among the fastest that I would normally experience along the Riverside Drive PSP.
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 12:06 am
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby Walst » Sat Jul 20, 2013 3:45 pm
Wonder if he's the same guy I pass every other day on the freeway (him heading North in the afternoon). Sits on the bike the same way you would on a trail bike or quad bike...absolutely rockets along.nickobec wrote:Had a similar experience on the PSP a couple of months ago, got passed my a electric mtb coming out from under canning bridge and he almost ran into a couple of peds.Marmoset wrote:I was passed last week by an electric bike probably doing well over 40km/h when you consider how easily he passed me and was wondering what the limit was. The thing that really struck me though was the totally blase way in which overtaking moves were carried out, in a kind of "out of my way plebs, I'm faster than you" manner which forced everyone else to account for the lack of space due to oncoming cycles.
Sitting bolt upright, barely pedalling and into the headwind at close to 40kph. Definitely more than 200 watts there. I was pumping out over 300 watts in a far more aerodynamic position at 37kph and he was just pulling away
- ColinOldnCranky
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby ColinOldnCranky » Fri Jul 26, 2013 4:29 pm
-
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:21 am
- Location: Perth, Western Australia
- Contact:
Re: Cycling road rules changes
Postby eldavo » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:24 pm
- 250W for pedelec e-bikes (Euro compatible)
- 200W non-pedelec power not dependent on pedalling to actuate the power (e.g. throttle) but still must be primarily pedal powered to be electric assisted.
PS: The Sachs 30cc (4 stroke?) petrol engine kit is Euro legal 200w with top speed of 25kph on flat as one of the few legal petrols. Long distance fuelling is the only advantage, but for un-able bodies there are probably better transport alternatives, and for able bodies they could pedal as fast for much less cost/weight/risk.
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.