Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

User avatar
trailgumby
Posts: 13150
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby trailgumby » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:22 pm

familyguy wrote:He has been named in a few sources. Shouldn't be hard to find if your Google-Fu is working. I can understand why they didn't use his name in the article.


HIs nom-de-doofus can be traced readily enough by finding on FB one or more of the photos credited to him that have his name redacted in the article.

User avatar
bychosis
Posts: 5614
Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:10 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby bychosis » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:23 pm

Duck! wrote:then add in the almost certainly unauthorised use and modification of those photos, the fake current affais show "screen shots", which would also fall under copyright regs

That is probably the easiest way to get faceache to shut down his page. Get the copyright owners to get faceache to take them down. Might try to claim ‘fair use’, but given the image manipulation, that would seem unlikely.
bychosis (bahy-koh-sis): A mental disorder of delusions indicating impaired contact with a reality of no bicycles.

User avatar
trailgumby
Posts: 13150
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby trailgumby » Sat Aug 11, 2018 12:42 pm

find_bruce wrote:Facebook should be caring because it’s exactly the fake news that is trashing their business model

^^^ This.

User avatar
trailgumby
Posts: 13150
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby trailgumby » Sat Aug 11, 2018 1:51 pm

For what it's worth, it is my view that Cycling Tips have done an excellent job with this article.

Bear in mind they are writing for a sceptical audience. We have been living this drama for the last 12 or so months, but the mainstream media and general population have not, so they need to be brought along the journey from the start.

By detailing how they have joined the dots they have made a pretty compelling case that they know exactly who the guy is. But by stopping short of naming him, they have given no ammunition for a legal reprisal.

If mainstream media goes anywhere near the petition again, with a view to giving it oxygen, they are going to get laughed at, ripped to shreds by their competitors, and likely hauled before the media watchdog. There is also the implicit threat that CT will share their information with those with more resources if required.

The guy has single-handedly done a lot of damage to cycling in Australia. There is no doubt in my mind that a number of deaths and life-changing injuries suffered by cyclists in this country can be attributed to the atmosphere he has generated and the echo chamber he has created for hatred and prejudice against people on bicycles. Is it entirely coincidence that the fatality rate has suddenly jumped by 80%? I'll leave that for you to decide.

Absent any visible signs of repentance on his part, I find it difficult to have any sympathy for him. GIven his history of psychopath-like behaviour, it would take consistent long term behaviour change for me to be convinced any such repentance was genuine. So care for the fragility of his mental state and any likelihood of self-harm are not high on my list of priorities compared to his victims.

My main reason for agreeing with the stance of not naming him is to prevent handing an enemy agent more ammunition with which to do harm.

User avatar
foo on patrol
Posts: 6352
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 11:12 am
Location: Sanstone Point QLD

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby foo on patrol » Sat Aug 11, 2018 2:23 pm

His name is known up here in SEQ and has been know for quite some time. :wink:

Foo
I don't suffer fools easily and so long as you have done your best,you should have no regrets.
Goal 6000km
Image

Jmuzz
Posts: 454
Joined: Mon Jan 29, 2018 1:42 pm

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby Jmuzz » Sat Aug 11, 2018 4:21 pm

trailgumby wrote:Bear in mind they are writing for a sceptical audience.


Yes true, a lot of it is aimed at his groupies, so that whenever the petition or the page are mentioned the link to the article can be dropped as a reply.

It leaves the foaming mouthed Lycra cyclist hater in a confused and violated state when they discover their leader is a sheep in wolves clothing.
It won't change their attitude, but does weaken the pack mentality.

User avatar
Duck!
Expert
Posts: 6919
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 8:21 pm
Location: On The Tools

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby Duck! » Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:29 pm

Jmuzz wrote:
trailgumby wrote:Bear in mind they are writing for a sceptical audience.


Yes true, a lot of it is aimed at his groupies, so that whenever the petition or the page are mentioned the link to the article can be dropped as a reply.

It leaves the foaming mouthed Lycra cyclist hater in a confused and violated state when they discover their leader is a sheep in wolves clothing.
It won't change their attitude, but does weaken the pack mentality.

I dunno, it might actually make them believe their stance is more validated if the chief protagonist is apparently a cyclist turning against his own kind.

DFROC may have had that effect of confusion when it was a spoof outfit and if it stayed that way, but when it turned nasty and started taking itself seriously, he became one of Them and no longer one of Us.
I had a thought, but it got run over as it crossed my mind.

g-boaf
Posts: 9662
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby g-boaf » Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:30 pm

Jmuzz wrote:
trailgumby wrote:Bear in mind they are writing for a sceptical audience.


Yes true, a lot of it is aimed at his groupies, so that whenever the petition or the page are mentioned the link to the article can be dropped as a reply.

It leaves the foaming mouthed Lycra cyclist hater in a confused and violated state when they discover their leader is a sheep in wolves clothing.
It won't change their attitude, but does weaken the pack mentality.


Confused and violated? They won't care at all, whatever better achieves their aims, that's all they care about.

User avatar
trailgumby
Posts: 13150
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby trailgumby » Sat Aug 11, 2018 8:45 pm

Just so we're clear, the sceptical audience I'm alluding to is the mainstream media and the general public.

There is no turning MrX's disciples, only drowning them out.

User avatar
Alex Simmons/RST
Expert
Posts: 4594
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:51 pm
Contact:

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby Alex Simmons/RST » Sun Aug 12, 2018 6:44 am

trailgumby wrote:Is it entirely coincidence that the fatality rate has suddenly jumped by 80%? I'll leave that for you to decide.

A point of order. This is not the case.

The number of fatalities is higher than the year before, but those were a lot lower than the year before that.

The fatalities this past (financial) year were within one standard deviation of the number of annual fatalities over the past 20 years, and there is no discernible trend up or down in the annual number of fatalities over that period.

That's not to say there is or is not a relationship between the incitement of increasing tensions by DFROC and cycling fatalities and injuries but the fatality stats cannot tell you that one way or another.

User avatar
andrewjcw
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:56 pm
Location: Newcastle, NSW

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby andrewjcw » Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:10 am

bychosis wrote:
Duck! wrote:then add in the almost certainly unauthorised use and modification of those photos, the fake current affais show "screen shots", which would also fall under copyright regs

That is probably the easiest way to get faceache to shut down his page. Get the copyright owners to get faceache to take them down. Might try to claim ‘fair use’, but given the image manipulation, that would seem unlikely.


I think you'd be doing well to get the page shut down but I guess it's possible. He's basically making memes. It's personal and not for profit so someone might send a cease and desist but there's no way you'd get in real trouble for doing it. I think the inciting/hate speech is a pretty long draw as well, but coupled with the identity theft it could end up in some real charges if it could be proven.

User avatar
trailgumby
Posts: 13150
Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:30 pm
Location: Northern Beaches, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby trailgumby » Sun Aug 12, 2018 1:44 pm

Alex Simmons/RST wrote:
trailgumby wrote:Is it entirely coincidence that the fatality rate has suddenly jumped by 80%? I'll leave that for you to decide.

A point of order. This is not the case.
Thanks for clarifying. The usual pitfall from going off headlines.

User avatar
mikesbytes
Super Mod
Super Mod
Posts: 18988
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:42 pm
Location: Tempe, Sydney
Contact:

Re: Finding Mr X - Cycling Tips Investigates the "Drivers for Registration of Cyclists" Hate Page

Postby mikesbytes » Sun Aug 12, 2018 6:40 pm

As much as the page needs to be shut down, the problem won't go away, it will just reappear elsewhere
If the R-1 rule is broken, what happens to N+1?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users