Why the silence following a major biking accident?
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby sogood » Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:50 pm
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- toolonglegs
- Posts: 15463
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 7:49 pm
- Location: Somewhere with padded walls and really big hills!
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby toolonglegs » Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:14 pm
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10617
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby find_bruce » Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:16 pm
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby il padrone » Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:27 pm
We are only ever going to be able to speculate. Often such speculation is completely flawed and may constitute libel of an involved party. The facts of the case will come out in the inquest, in several months time.sogood wrote:At the same time, by knowing what the involved reasons were, it would help fellow riders in avoiding similar situations.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
-
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:33 pm
- Location: Sydney (Rhodes to City Commuter)
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby Sydguy » Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:33 pm
How can cycling insurance and registration be brought into this accident?
If he had a massive rego plate and was insured for $1,000,000,000,000 it would have saved him?
I sincerely hope that the NSW Police investigators, coroners, judges and potentially jurors are not so bias/twisted in their views.
Makes me sick.
JM
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21515
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby g-boaf » Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:26 pm
I agree with Sydguy on his comments about the sick/twisted comments about this. Some people are just cruel.
- RonK
- Posts: 11508
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 2:08 pm
- Location: If you need to know, ask me
- Contact:
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby RonK » Sat Feb 16, 2013 9:54 pm
As it turned out, no other vehicle was involved. Some should have been a little more circumspect with their comments until the facts were known.
And a bit earlier there were many ill-advised comments about an apparent road rage incident where a motorist ran down and then assaulted a cyclist, who it turned was bonking his girlfriend.
-
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:33 pm
- Location: Sydney (Rhodes to City Commuter)
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby Sydguy » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:19 pm
It was reported, then changed, that a truck was involved - from the same company already under investigation by Police for a similar accident.
Turns out the truckie had only stopped to help and it was a Jeep 4WD who hit the bunch.
JM
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby sogood » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:58 am
Very true in many cases. Not referring to the tragic incident from yesterday in Western Sydney but generally I have encountered many cases where a major accident with fellow cyclists present and the case get closed deliberately. It may be an organization thing, liability issues, avoidance of talking down the sport or other reasons. To me, it's such a shuttered approach to the risks we all face on the road.toolonglegs wrote:Maybe because nobody knows exactly what's happened straight after a fatal accident. sometimes it is better to shut up until the facts are known.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby sogood » Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:05 am
I agree those cases were poorly discussed and I too dislike the irresponsible blame game that commonly happens. What's more important in my mind is staying objective and seeking safer riding practices eg. Certain roads, certain conditions, certain circumstances. I think with each accident major and minor, there's something worthwhile to be learnt by noob and experienced riders. In the long run, these case histories are instructive in accident avoidance.RonK wrote:Only a couple of weeks ago another Sydney cyclist was found fatally injured by the roadside, and there was an immediate response condemning the hit and run driver responsible.
As it turned out, no other vehicle was involved. Some should have been a little more circumspect with their comments until the facts were known.
And a bit earlier there were many ill-advised comments about an apparent road rage incident where a motorist ran down and then assaulted a cyclist, who it turned was bonking his girlfriend.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
-
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:41 am
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby Percrime » Sun Feb 17, 2013 10:09 am
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby sogood » Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:58 am
Coroners report tend not to have value in dealing with the present. The issue is, what we, as riders, can do now to mitigate those risks on our daily rides.Percrime wrote:SO maybe see what the coroner says?
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- TimW
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 3:37 pm
- Location: Near the M7C
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby TimW » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:02 pm
Coroners also make recomendations in their reports for the future, it is then up to the relevant authorities to act..or not, on those reccomendations.sogood wrote:Coroners report tend not to have value in dealing with the present. The issue is, what we, as riders, can do now to mitigate those risks on our daily rides.Percrime wrote:SO maybe see what the coroner says?
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby sogood » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:15 pm
Yes, that's exactly my point. Effecting the recommendations of coroner's reports tend to be a long way in the future, if it ever happens. We as daily cyclists need to know the circumstances (not just SUV/truckie bashing) and learn to adapt for the present.TimW wrote:Coroners also make recomendations in their reports for the future, it is then up to the relevant authorities to act..or not, on those reccomendations.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- find_bruce
- Moderator
- Posts: 10617
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 8:42 pm
- Location: Sydney
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby find_bruce » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:33 pm
will the coroner say anything?Percrime wrote:SO maybe see what the coroner says
As far as I can tell there was no coronial inquest into David Williams death on the M4 in 2010, however the driver Stephen Day pleaded guilty to manslaughter in February 2012.
Edit and in February 2013 is reported to have been sentenced to 9 years jail & is intending to appeal the sentence
- Mulger bill
- Super Mod
- Posts: 29060
- Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:41 pm
- Location: Sunbury Vic
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby Mulger bill » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:59 pm
No way we can do anything about fatigued dopers except hopefind_bruce wrote:will the coroner say anything?Percrime wrote:SO maybe see what the coroner says
As far as I can tell there was no coronial inquest into David Williams death on the M4 in 2010, however the driver Stephen Day pleaded guilty to manslaughter in February 2012.
I'm not a fan of freeway riding (where legal) but that's more down to the 'orrible amount of tyre shredding crap that inhabits shoulders in this state.
London Boy 29/12/2011
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby il padrone » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:13 pm
However the facts of a fatal collision tend to come forth in the coronial inquest (or a trial). Without those facts any 'mitigation of risks' is fanciful.sogood wrote:Coroners report tend not to have value in dealing with the present. The issue is, what we, as riders, can do now to mitigate those risks on our daily rides.Percrime wrote:SO maybe see what the coroner says?
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- sogood
- Posts: 17168
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:31 am
- Location: Sydney AU
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby sogood » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:19 pm
True, to the nth degree if it was a good report. Otherwise there are still a lot of safety practices that could be learnt without waiting for that final report. At the end of the day, the coroner may not even be a cyclist.il padrone wrote:However the facts of a fatal collision tend to come forth in the coronial inquest (or a trial). Without those facts any 'mitigation of risks' is fanciful.
RK wrote:And that is Wikipedia - I can write my own definition.
- InTheWoods
- Posts: 1900
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 2:34 pm
- Location: Brisbane
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby InTheWoods » Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:15 pm
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21515
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby g-boaf » Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:27 pm
You don't need a coronial to see the dangers of bicycles being on the same stretch of road as vehicles doing 110km/h or more. The speed differential is too great. A motorway is not a good place for bicycles to be on. The breakdown lane as a cycle way is just a shortcut - rather than doing a proper cycle way that is separated from the traffic lanes of the motorway.Percrime wrote:SO maybe see what the coroner says?
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby il padrone » Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:15 pm
Uhuh..... ???g-boaf wrote:the dangers of bicycles being on the same stretch of road as vehicles doing 110km/h or more. The speed differential is too great.
This happens on almost every non-urban main road across the nation. All of them have less shoulder room than a freeway emergency lane. You are knocking an awful lot of the country out as unsuitable for cycling
I do agree that freeway emergency lanes make a very poor cycle-way, however there is much more to consider. What is really at issue is driving habits, the nature of on-ramp merging, and the respect for & awareness of other road-users.
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- g-boaf
- Posts: 21515
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:11 pm
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby g-boaf » Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:30 pm
So you basically knew what I was getting at, but couldn't resist the urge to nit pick.
And you demanded the other day that you weren't to be quoted in such a manner as above, so why should you now do the same to me? Isn't that a bit rich...
- il padrone
- Posts: 22931
- Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 pm
- Location: Heading for home.
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby il padrone » Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:50 pm
Yes, I do dislike riding on freeways. I have done it, and generally it is fairly safe, but it is far from a pleasant riding environment. I also do not like, nor recommend riding on major highways however I have done a lot of riding on these roads. These and all of our rural secondary and minor roads are all 100kmh limit (often drivers are doing a good bit over the odds as well). I don't think we can write roads off for cycling use because of the speed limit, or even the general speed of traffic. There is a lot more at stake and a lot more to consider.
Key point, getting back to the thread, is to wait for any police statements and coroner's report. For all we know this collision may have had nothing to do with the fact that it occurred on a freeway (eg, drugs, texting distraction, brake failure etc.).
"An unjustified and unethical imposition on a healthy activity."
- gururug
- Posts: 1531
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:05 am
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby gururug » Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:58 pm
b) The touch wood factor
c) Sensitivity to families
It's an interesting question.... but just human nature to draw back when the proverbial hits....the......
While I agree there should be something like the Aviation Safety Board comprising of a group of veteran riders of that dicipline, backed up by a support group / legal assistance for non-at-fault riders. Forum discussion immediately after major incidents is usually lacking detail or laced with personal bias.
-
- Posts: 9810
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:48 am
Re: Why the silence following a major biking accident?
Postby human909 » Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:11 pm
I would disagree. It is human nature to discuss the causes, the blame and the solutions when somebody dies in an activity that you associate yourself with. However in the case of cycling it seems that many times there is an information void. Furthermore the cause and blame is often obvious.gururug wrote:It's an interesting question.... but just human nature to draw back when the proverbial hits....the......
Amongst the rockclimbers discussions are enthusiastic whenever incidents occur. Because of a tight knit community information normally comes out. Also there is often MORE to discuss as almost always it is user error. While discussion such things can be a little sensitive for those closely involved, the discussion is essential to ensure risks are known and participants learn and are aware of mistakes that can occur.
Return to “Cycling Safety and Advocacy”
- General Australian Cycling Topics
- Info / announcements
- Buying a bike / parts
- General Cycling Discussion
- The Bike Shed
- Cycling Health
- Cycling Safety and Advocacy
- Women's Cycling
- Bike & Gear Reviews
- Cycling Trade
- Stolen Bikes
- Bicycle FAQs
- The Market Place
- Member to Member Bike and Gear Sales
- Want to Buy, Group Buy, Swap
- My Bikes or Gear Elsewhere
- Serious Biking
- Audax / Randonneuring
- Retro biking
- Commuting
- MTB
- Recumbents
- Fixed Gear/ Single Speed
- Track
- Electric Bicycles
- Cyclocross and Gravel Grinding
- Dragsters / Lowriders / Cruisers
- Children's Bikes
- Cargo Bikes and Utility Cycling
- Road Racing
- Road Biking
- Training
- Time Trial
- Triathlon
- International and National Tours and Events
- Cycle Touring
- Touring Australia
- Touring Overseas
- Touring Bikes and Equipment
- Australia
- Western Australia
- New South Wales
- Queensland
- South Australia
- Victoria
- ACT
- Tasmania
- Northern Territory
- Country & Regional
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
- All times are UTC+10:00
- Top
- Delete cookies
About the Australian Cycling Forums
The Australian Cycling Forums is a welcoming community where you can ask questions and talk about the type of bikes and cycling topics you like.
Bicycles Network Australia
Forum Information
Connect with BNA
This website uses affiliate links to retail platforms including ebay, amazon, proviz and ribble.